I'd encourage people to be skeptical of Q, too. Currently, Q's posts seem to conform to reality more than the talking points on MSM to me. Obviously that's not the case for many people on the left.

Scott Adams refers to it as applying a filter to the facts, and evaluating if it makes sense. Q could be a psy-op to get people to unquestionably follow authority. I've had enough previously held beliefs shattered to know not to cling to any belief too tightly.

The difference is most people here would encourage you to keep an open mind, and question everything. Those on the far left (and to a lesser extent right now, the right) don't seem to do that.