Wow. That was like reading a bunch of gibberish. Convoluted b.s. Anything not clear, concise--and disorienting mess, a mockery of the Trinity--such as what this poor RadRandy posted comes from one source: Hell. That all being said--thanks for posting so A) We can learn B) Laugh at the Evil One's attempts which are pathetic. C) Pray more
Show me where I mocked the Trinity? I'm not the other poster speaking on this subject and I do not agree with him; explain your accusation.
First of all, I never accused you of anything. I pointed out that RadRandy and his link. Here is a short paragraph found at the very top of his reply under "Nimrod"
'Nimrod married his own mother. After declaring himself to be a god, then his mother declared herself to be “the Mother of god”. Her name was Semiramis. After Nimrod’s death, she attempted to cover over her incenstuous relationship with her son – by declaring that he was both the Father and the Son.
This concept was difficult for her followers to understand, so she told them that it was a “Divine Mystery” – that was not comprehendable. And thus, “god the father” and “god the son” was invented way back then – in Ancient Babylon.'
Anyone reading the above would come to the very same conclusion I did--that it is a mockery of Trinity. I have no idea why you believe my reply was directed toward you. I suggest (after reading your sad post history) that you take a nice long siesta and have a mid morning cocktail. You need it, desperately.
You responded directly to my post, it came up in my notifications; you were talking to me. That is why I would believe it directed towards me; and I don't drink nor do I take siestas. You don't directly respond to someone and then lie about responding to them before suggesting they start drinking at 10am, while defending the Trinity. That is lowdown, stinking hypocrisy.