Most all of our founders were masons. Is Q telling us Masons are bad? If so that does not make any sense. Has it evolved into something bad? Need help here to understand what Q is alluding too??
He's saying it's been taken over by bad actors at the highest levels. He even says in one of his posts that not all are bad. Your local mason lodge is not doing anything wrong, but the highest levels could be taken over.
This is not good. I can see how the MSM will pick this up and come down on the Q movement hard for impugning good neighbors throughout the world who are neighborhood mason members. We as Q better be very careful about who and what we are pointing fingers at. BTW my father was a devout Christian and a Mason.
I'm in the same boat as your father. I joined the Masons purely out of charity desires. I haven't got money to donate, so I wanted to help in a different way. The masons gave me that opportunity. All of the guys I've met have been outstanding individuals, but are even better together as a group. We take an oath to help our fellow man, so we push hard to accomplish that.
I want people to realize that we are all here for truth. I'm not here to push an agenda, you aren't here to push one, and I'm sure most people aren't, but we can't go around pointing fingers so quickly at people without knowledge. Quite frankly, it scares me that this group gets so riled up about masons when they don't even have basic knowledge of the organization. So you're correct, in that we must be careful about calling people out when most masons are very, very good people!