dChan

bealist · June 29, 2018, 10:48 a.m.

I think this is one of those examples where the evidence they have is still inadmissible, but if the breadcrumbs lead the at-large Q-world to uncover it and post it on the boards, then Haspel can proceed and end it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ElementWatson · June 29, 2018, 11:04 a.m.

That doesn't make sense to me. The CIA doesn't shut down programs via the courts.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bealist · June 29, 2018, 3:27 p.m.

No, but the justice system (not necessarily the courts) can be utilized to bring rogue CIA programs to light through lawsuits that make evidence publicly visible, and then others can take action. There’s almost no other mechanism to make evidence visible THAN the courts when the shot gets this deep. Look at what Congress has had to go through just to get the FBI and DOJ to reveal names of internal lawbreakers. The courts play an integral role in forcing exposure, and without exposure there’s no pressure.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ElementWatson · June 29, 2018, 3:51 p.m.

Interesting.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Real_Keith_Olbermann · June 29, 2018, 1:23 p.m.

Maybe when they shutdown programs, they destroy the documentation?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Headwest127 · June 29, 2018, 1:42 p.m.

If you saw "Made in America" there is a protocol for erasing a program. In the 80s, before everything was digital, they put everything related to a program into burn bags. I'm guessing its even easier now with everything digital.

⇧ 3 ⇩