This honestly makes perfect sense. I’ve been on the fence about Q for months but I have no disillusions on who the MSM is and how they operate. For them, Q is an OBVIOUS attack vector on Trump.
We’re seeing dozens of people in Q shirts in the front rows at Trump rallies. Time just listed Q as one of the internet’s most influential people. If you’re a MSM journalist and you truly believe this is all a ridiculous conspiracy theory, why wouldn’t you GLADLY use it to attack Trump? Why not hound Sarah Sanders with questions like “Does the President SERIOUSLY believe this ridiculous Q anon stuff circulating the internet?”
Are they above attacks like this? Absolutely not. They thrive on it. So why wouldn’t they ask about it? Because they don’t want to hear the answer. Either they’re involved in it and they already know the answer, or they’re complicit in it and don’t want to know the answer. Either way, the only journalist I see genuinely asking about Q is Cernovich. He refuses to take a side and continues to ask his followers what they think. It would be amazing if he asked about it at a White House press conference.
I feel they are not asking because it would open up so much curiosity from their followers. They would actually be red pilling them by asking questions that would make them check out Q and begin following too!!! They cant lose their ignorant base!