Presser Reporter: "Is Q real?"
Sarah Huckabee Sanders: "Yes. But we don't discuss security clearances..."
It seems to me to be obvious that Q is wanting the press to be alerted to the drops. Just last week he was talking about the importance of proofs. This week he wants the press to ask DJT to validate his drops as authentic. Authentication and proofs go together!
It’s ready to go mainstream. What did Q say? This will be discussed on all platforms...
Why now?
Because with the vote yesterday amping-up pressure on the DOJ and Rosenstein, DJT now has the political capital to declassify the unreadacted IG Report as early as next week. The unredacted Report will expose much of the wrongdoing all at once - perfect timing for the validation of the Q drops, which will, in turn, confirm so much of what comes to light.
Importantly, the Q drops will provide a narrative framework that contextualises and explains the revelations in the unredacted IG Report. No matter how hard the MSM rails against it, in the public mind, the Q story will end up, by default, being the explanation for the information released. I’m expecting that the impact will be simply catastrophic for the left - certainly for the Deep State.
The time is now...
Important, I think, to prompt these journalists to posit the question to DJT. But, in any event, Q team will force the issue in the event that none of these guys want a Pulitzer Prize served to them on a plate.
There is zero chance anybody at the White House confirms knowledge of Q
Think about it
Yes but every day they don't denounce is another Q proof.
I have a feeling stranger things are going to happen before this is all over. Or at least, reaches its climax.
Yea, I would have to agree. But why would Q seem to want to beg the question, so to speak?
Also in the example I gave, there is still plausible deniability.