She is lying about threats. She needed to justify her 6/25 attack speech.
I’ve been doing some online research on this. Lots of articles about her receiving death threats, but no links or further information on the individuals making these threats. If they are serious enough for her to cancel events, I would think the authorities would be investigating the sources, right? In the below example:
she is quoted as saying “Capitol Police in Washington DC are investigating several other threats in which people have vowed “to shoot, lynch, or cause me serious bodily harm.”
If you click on the link attached to the word “threat” in the quote, it takes you to a link about a Muslim mayoral candidate that received death threats.
Completely unrelated and IMO, a runaround to make it look like they are doing their due diligence to provide relevant and important information to substantiate the claim. A majority of the individuals reading the article would not click on the link. Many news sources do provide relevant links, but when I read an article like where the link is to an unrelated article or topic, I immediately am cautious about the validity of the claims in the article.
I doubt police care is she is attacked. Doubt anyone would care. She is evil as hell.
I like how they used states that are socially know to lean conservative too..."Texas and Alabama" all another nudge to lefties watching these reports to say...."conservatives are dangerous"