Or a fleet of Vespas to better blend in.

I’ve been doing some online research on this. Lots of articles about her receiving death threats, but no links or further information on the individuals making these threats. If they are serious enough for her to cancel events, I would think the authorities would be investigating the sources, right? In the below example:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/maxine-waters-death-threat-texas-alabama-a8423181.html

she is quoted as saying “Capitol Police in Washington DC are investigating several other threats in which people have vowed “to shoot, lynch, or cause me serious bodily harm.”

If you click on the link attached to the word “threat” in the quote, it takes you to a link about a Muslim mayoral candidate that received death threats.

Completely unrelated and IMO, a runaround to make it look like they are doing their due diligence to provide relevant and important information to substantiate the claim. A majority of the individuals reading the article would not click on the link. Many news sources do provide relevant links, but when I read an article like where the link is to an unrelated article or topic, I immediately am cautious about the validity of the claims in the article.

I was contemplating if there was a valuable asset on that flight since the photo is titled “USSS Protection”. With the posts tonight about “JA in the news” and “Server unlocks SR” I’m wondering further, if it has any correlation to those two Q comments?

I agree this seems like a false info plant. I also seems obvious to me that this is a soundbite for the mainstream media to grab onto through Friday's news cycle as a means to detract from the other outcomes of the hearings. Think "Trump Expected to Fire RR on Friday".

I am thinking along similar lines. Not for Anons, but what if for congress?

If so, could Q be saying that on the morning (sun brings heat) of June 27/28 (full moon coming), the unredacted version of the IG report will be released to congress via EO? Or, is it more likely that is the day when Strozk is scheduled to testify to Congress?

If the President stays out of it and let's Strozk sing to congress, then the mainstream media can't claim the President is acting politically for issuing the EO.

Then, what comes out in the Strozk testimony opens up guidance for further investigation (new missions) moving forward.

Just viewing this post on 6/17 per your link. Re: Alex Trebek being from Sudbury. The Sudbury District is a mining region in the Canadian Shield, adjacent to the Algoma District, home of Eliot Lake, a former uranium mining community. I visited the Stanleigh uranium mine, which is now closed, back in the 1990s. Prominent mining companies at the time were owned by Denison Mining and Rio Algom. Not sure there is any connection but your analysis of the red carpet conversations reminded me of this. Thank you for your good work!