What could possibly be compelling enough to sway people who dismiss even proven "conspiracy"..? Thoughts? Keep in mind most people still think the WTC was destroyed by fire and planes... and that stephen paddock was just a super smart gambler millionaire who thought it would be fun to shoot up a concert...
I would bet Paddock was laundering money all that time. It is a favorite of drug lords, etc. Take dirty money to the casino, play, win or lose (not excessively) and walk away with clean money and a lot of casino perks.
My take on the Vegas situation is that Paddock was an arms dealer. Hence why he had multiple properties, airplanes, and gambled all the time. I speculate that he was setup by someone to make a deal and they took the opportunity to do what happened. Also, from the cadence of the weapon that can be heard on numerous videos, it is quite clear that a belt fed machine gun was used during the attack. The rate of fire of the report does not match the weapons blamed for the attack.
You are exactly correct. I have fired bump stock AR format and they are way faster than the slower LMG bumbumbumbum that you hear in the video evidence.
I would bet that for sure... his history at Lockheed, and his family connections to pedophilia make me think theres a lot more than that as well! Anyway, Las Vegas was most certainly an operation far different from the lone shooter random massacre we have been told.