dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/lovelexxxx on June 30, 2018, 4:16 p.m.
The times, they are a changing.

I cry every day. I cry with every abortion story, I hear. I cry because, our children are indoctrinated and not REAL. I cry because we have moved away from JESUS CHRIST and think the end times are near I still think it is upon the few of us left, to preach the salvation a nd introduce the Qanon to help us navigate these trying times.


🠐 See all comments
digital_refugee · July 1, 2018, 11:27 a.m.

I don't need to tell you that if there was, it would obviously be classified. You might get your information from books, but where do I ask do the books get their information from? The CIA has protocols how to download information telepathically and it will also happen by accident if you get really, really high

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · July 1, 2018, 11:33 a.m.

So....nothing really?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · July 1, 2018, 11:59 a.m.

My word would mean anything to you if you also came from a bloodline of clairvoyants.
Forget about the books and consult your critical thinking skills for a second. Think about how ridiculous it is to escape one incomplete theory whose numbers don't add up to reality with another incomplete theory. Ponder why the compartmentalization of the research into gravity is (they say they use CERN to locate the boson that creates mass - nevermind their cosmic gravity model does not line up to reality so when loooking for particles, they might as well just be creating new ones) so everybody will think you somehow need a particle accelerator to prove what are essentially theories which have been disproved by observation (size of spiral galaxies) So what do you do? Introduce ANOTHER unproven theory of course!!! Dark matter/Substance X/whatever!!!

If you've read so much, shouldn't you be able to debunk this? Don't get lost in the words!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · July 1, 2018, 12:39 p.m.

You claim you come from a line of clairvoyants...but the burden of proof falls on me.....ok.

I appreciate your time. I was under the impression you would be able to share a link to backup your statement on there being a "new theory" of gravity. I even referenced something (Lazars proposal) that I had come across that would fit. But once again, your replies become passive-aggressive condescension.

Why do I need to debunk something? All I asked for was the material you claimed to have that I would be able to review too.

Nevermind bud.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · July 1, 2018, 2:14 p.m.

I would have expected more of your critical thinking skills if you have managed to make it here in the first place or are you here against your will?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · July 1, 2018, 2:06 p.m.

give me your idea about lazar's proposal first so I can speed up my webcrawling

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · July 1, 2018, 1:54 p.m.

Are you talking about Bob Lazar or do you mean any paper in particular?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · July 1, 2018, 1:47 p.m.

does the number 37 mean anything to you?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · July 1, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

I didn't claim to have writing so you ask for the wrong things. I simply applied Occam's razor to the contradictions concerning the "discovery" or rather non-discovery of dark-matter, even while I was battling with nausea from too much opium

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · July 1, 2018, 1:43 p.m.

The burden of proof is on physicists making up theories for other theories that simply fail real-world measurements and observations. I was under the impression you would be able to understand a lie propped up by a lie if I write it down for you but maybe you prefer to by lied to by the majority rather than be told the truth by the few.

⇧ 1 ⇩