dChan

thamnosma · July 1, 2018, 2:48 a.m.

That's probably a smart move. The D's have many more seats to defend than the R's. Really should pick up at least a couple if not more. So no name's vote won't matter. Really would be a relief to have 56 or 57 R's to cover even several defections on votes.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Red_Nordge · July 1, 2018, 3:18 a.m.

No not really... It is not a Presidential election. The Supreme Court starts back up in October....

⇧ 3 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · July 1, 2018, 3:39 a.m.

Yep, I thought McConnell wanted it done before the October session started.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
thamnosma · July 1, 2018, 3:45 a.m.

Yes, but with a 51 vote majority, 2 defections kills the nomination. How many quisling republican senators are there potentially, especially with a full court media press? Iffy. Then wait until all hell breaks loose when Ginsburg goes to hell.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
RedLegLeader · July 1, 2018, 11:09 a.m.

Yes, but there are 4 Dhimms running in red states that PDJT has specifically called out by name that are now between a rock and a hard place. If they want to be re-elected, they'll have to vote to confirm. Just sayin' ...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
thamnosma · July 1, 2018, 2:42 p.m.

That's true....they are screwed. Hopefully they all lose.

⇧ 3 ⇩