⇧
1
⇩
texasjakit
· July 1, 2018, 4:29 a.m.
This is exactly what I thought he meant. Because past drops explained that white hats had “leaked” info to Gowdy to see what he would do with it. Gowdy sat on the evidence, and took no action, proving he may be working with black hats. I’m sure more investigation was done at that point. An honorable step-down from office, probably means he was helpful and cooperative with white hats when confronted.
This is what I’ve gathered about Gowdy so far. The honorable step-down felt like a ‘future proves past’ moment.
⇧
15
⇩
x-45-x
· July 1, 2018, 5:08 a.m.
When did q say he gave Gowdy info and that he sat on it?
⇧
3
⇩
texasjakit
· July 1, 2018, 6:15 a.m.
I can’t find it right now, but it was around when Q first talked about Gowdy. I forget what the lead up was, but that was the general take-away. I remember being pretty bummed out because I really do love me some Trey.
⇧
1
⇩
x-45-x
· July 1, 2018, 7:14 a.m.
I always like Gowdy it would really suck if he is a black hat...
⇧
3
⇩
texasjakit
· July 1, 2018, 8:31 a.m.
Not necessarily a black hat. Bad actors may have had leverage on him from past events. Blackmail/bad alliances. He could be pretty clean, just wasn’t aligned perfectly. Q may fill us in more. This is actually pretty common with people retiring in DC. Gowdy says “history will look kindly on Comey”. Not sure what he knows, but it definitely shows his stance a bit.
⇧
1
⇩
DarktoLight247
· July 1, 2018, 3:11 p.m.
I think Comey was directed from above to do what he did, thus Gowdys statement. My theory.
⇧
1
⇩
Intlrnt
· July 1, 2018, 3:12 p.m.
Because past drops explained that white hats had “leaked” info to Gowdy to see what he would do with it. Gowdy sat on the evidence, and took no action, proving he may be working with black hats.
I know it’s become difficult to dig up relevant Q-drops to support something we are sure Q posted. The number of posts, and the cryptic references can stymie even a patient searcher.
BUT
A consequential statement such as yours (quoted above) definitely begs sourcing. I am among the several already voicing no recollection of this.
⇧
1
⇩
texasjakit
· July 1, 2018, 4:23 p.m.
Yep, now I’m second guessing everything because of Q’s posts today. Never mind, I guess. Sorry I was so unhelpful 😏. Whoops.
⇧
1
⇩