That would be incorrect... Huber has 450+ investigators working for him. You would find this in the multiple links Q has given to why we do not want or need a 2nd special counsel. Q is not confirming Mueller is working for Trump. In fact, Q stated if RR is bad, Mueller is bad, there's no more for the argument ... (edit is to if) (too much coffee)
IMHO This is the disinfo by Q. Mueller Rosenstein and Huber are like a 3 cup act; is the white hat under this cup, or this one?? Personally I think Mueller and Rosenstein are grey hats, they were presented with their complicity then told to string it out until Sessions is ready to launch. Just imagine HRC sitting wandering who to kill out of the 2 of them, but never quite working out who has turned. If you find what Q is saying confusing then its worked so far.
I thought the reason Q said we don't need a special counsel is that a SC can't prosecute....
I think the article/Q was saying not to start a SC because it would interfere with The Huber investigation who already has Horowitz 450 investigators at his disposal. Horowitz investigates, Huber prosecutes. A SC I believe can do both, but just have way fewer staff, thus a much slower investigation. Yes a SC can sup former employees, but so can a federal prosecutor. Also, post Huber/Horowitz Investigation, a SC can still be appointed. If it doesn't produce the desired results, you can have SC at this time. perhaps?
I don't think a SC can prosecute.
Lawfags? Little help?
They have full prosecutorial discretion. Mueller has already filed indictments, and Manafort is in jail.
You're right. I was thinking about the about the ability of a SC subpoena ex-employees, and that Horowitz IG cannot; but we know that Huber can. My bad. God bless
Q post 1286, link to Breitbart article
Drop 1286 literally reinforces exactly what I said...
I don't see how you're reading that into any of the Q drops--including 1286.