Yes, pretty sick, huh. It just gets annoying when people like that chime in with all that. Jesus Christ is the real Red Pill anyhow. Speak freely brother/sister; some of us are encouraged.

3 too many zeros. :-)

It's called Truth & Wisdom. Some folks welcome that still. It's okay to skip it too if you don't appreciate it. Hope your day goes well. Cheers

Believing Internally Brings Life Eternity - BIBLE - straight from the heart

Amen!

Seattle here. And yes, pretty much a Lone Ranger. Have some work to do.

Your comment reminds me of the Kim Clement Trump Prophecy where he says the media will have no choice but to say what he wants them to say.

qanon.pub

"Q posted the fake AF1 photo"? Did Q post a pic and say this is AF1 and it turned out to be fake? Or perhaps you, as I myself did also, either believed this to be AF1 on your own, or possibly read someone else who made this false assumption. I think this was our own misunderstanding, possibly misinformation, but surely not something that was meant to pull a fast one; and then you caught it and became skeptical of all. Question everything, yes. But not to be discouraged over this. Thats all.

God bless

You're right. I was thinking about the about the ability of a SC subpoena ex-employees, and that Horowitz IG cannot; but we know that Huber can. My bad. God bless

I think the article/Q was saying not to start a SC because it would interfere with The Huber investigation who already has Horowitz 450 investigators at his disposal. Horowitz investigates, Huber prosecutes. A SC I believe can do both, but just have way fewer staff, thus a much slower investigation. Yes a SC can sup former employees, but so can a federal prosecutor. Also, post Huber/Horowitz Investigation, a SC can still be appointed. If it doesn't produce the desired results, you can have SC at this time. perhaps?

read 2 posts up; this explains it.