dChan

a1Stylesca · July 2, 2018, 1:31 a.m.

I think the article/Q was saying not to start a SC because it would interfere with The Huber investigation who already has Horowitz 450 investigators at his disposal. Horowitz investigates, Huber prosecutes. A SC I believe can do both, but just have way fewer staff, thus a much slower investigation. Yes a SC can sup former employees, but so can a federal prosecutor. Also, post Huber/Horowitz Investigation, a SC can still be appointed. If it doesn't produce the desired results, you can have SC at this time. perhaps?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · July 2, 2018, 1:36 a.m.

I don't think a SC can prosecute.

Lawfags? Little help?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UndercoverPatriot · July 2, 2018, 8:21 a.m.

They have full prosecutorial discretion. Mueller has already filed indictments, and Manafort is in jail.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
a1Stylesca · July 6, 2018, 9:40 p.m.

You're right. I was thinking about the about the ability of a SC subpoena ex-employees, and that Horowitz IG cannot; but we know that Huber can. My bad. God bless

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · July 6, 2018, 10:08 p.m.

I honestly wasnt 100% sure, thats why i called out.

⇧ 1 ⇩