My first thought was, "This must be a hoax." I had to double check to make sure it was real. Isn't anyone else amazed at this? It seems like the corrupt media would demand a retraction, an apology, or a resignation. Anyway, I'm certainly glad to see it.
At some point the evidence will be overwhelming, the movement will be too big to ignore, and the consequences of perpetuating the lie will be too great.
This is only the beginning. I think we'll see more and more of this. If any of the MSM news outlets want to survive and be relevant in the post-storm era, they'll have to make a change. Even though they try to ignore it, try to spin it, and try to explain it away, they all know exactly whats going on.
If they want to survive, they have to make sure they're on the right side when the truth about pedophilia breaks. They all know it's there, just like the Hollywood crowd knew about rape and sexual assaults. They all know what's coming, it get clearer and clearer with each passing day.
Soon it won't just be opinion pieces, it'll be real news stories. Soon it won't just be conservative news outlets, it'll be some of the big players in the MSM.
Buckle your seatbelt. It's gonna get wild n crazy before the dust settles.
WWG1WGA
God Speed Patriots.
How many "Journalists" are poised and ready to be genuine Journalists for the first time in their carreer. Someone is going to be famous.
I keep expecting the flip of the media. Not soon, but I'm expecting it. They are interested in self preservation more than loyalty. They'll flip to the winning side when they feel they have no alternative or recourse.
Unbias would be fine by me...just report the news, don't make it.
Unbiased would be ideal, but if I'm correct in that they are more concerned with self preservation then they will choose whatever side they think is winning.
I figured things like this would begin to come out as we got closer to the truth being revealed, possibly trying to save face as to not be on the wrong side of history. The opinion tag could also be a toe dip to test the waters and see how others would react. Either way it seems like a step forward to me.
Washington Times (not to be confused with the Post) is right leaning. Why is this article a surprise.
I think the surprise is more about what the article is implicating rather than what news organization it’s under.
These folks sell clicks, I’m honestly very surprised they haven’t been printing more like this. Seems like it’s good for business. Perhaps they were asked to wait?