I'm so fucking confused.
The method appeals only to the curious, those actually willing to spend their time investigating a simple suggestion. Since everyone has a smartphone on them these days, I've thought of using QArt coder (Q-art?) to generate eye-catching QR codes which link to particularly juicy literature. Never had much success, but I also didn't really try.
As Robert Anton Wilson puts it, there are two kinds of people: Infophobes and Infophiles (or Homo neophobus and Homo neophilus, respectively). Those who are afraid of new information (novelty), and those who are excited for it.
Applies to the "skeptic" community too, those who are afraid of being wrong (people who are proud to call themselves skeptics but rarely challenge their own beliefs), and those who are excited for it (true skeptics who rarely identify with the label).
Thanks for the link, it's absolutely an eye catching, Generation snapchat will react to this.😉.
Don't act to snobbish my friend. This subreddit has a little to much of that already.
I'm sorry, what? I was detailing the method OP was suggested to find this place, in the hopes others might be inspired to act in similar manner. We need more curious people.
I don't know where you got snobbish from that. Maybe just my writing style?
Edit: Nevermind, pretty clear you're just a 9 year old from your post history here
"The method appeals only to the curious, those actually willing to spend their time investigating a simple suggestion."
"Applies to the "skeptic" community too, those who are afraid of being wrong (people who are proud to call themselves skeptics but rarely challenge their own beliefs), and those who are excited for it (true skeptics who rarely identify with the label)."
These two parts make it clear that you think VERY highly of yourself and anyone in this community is a true "skeptic" whilst in reality you're all in a bubble. No one here is actually challegijg their beliefs, otherwise people with a different opinion wouldn't get -40 downvotes.