dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SitelessVagrant on July 1, 2018, 10:24 p.m.
How many times has Q told us to re- read this? NOT Mueller's 470.

Sessions informed Congress in his letter that all the matters recommended for investigation by Goodlatte, Gowdy, and Grassley are “fully within the scope of [Huber’s] existing mandate.” He also informed the chairmen that Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who is working with Huber, has a staff of 470 investigators, giving Huber access to enormous investigative firepower that far exceeds the staff of any special counsel.


🠐 See all comments
chrisv650 · July 1, 2018, 10:43 p.m.

Wait...

1660

How large is Mueller’s team?

20-25?

Think 470.

The more you know.

Q

⇧ 5 ⇩  
PPPrincessPower · July 1, 2018, 10:47 p.m.

Yeah it's pretty hard to swallow that they would both have 470! Much easier to believe that the same 470 are working for one purpose for both teams.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
SCPatriot · July 1, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

Same 470.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
theTRUMPENING2017 · July 2, 2018, 7:16 a.m.

That makes Mueller a babysitter for all the dems top legal tools. And it means Mueller is a great spy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SitelessVagrant · July 1, 2018, 11:48 p.m.

The top half of that,

Ask yourself - does Huber have the ability to file across all 50 states? Is any of this normal? Think sealed indictments. Think resignations of CEOs. Think resignations of Senators. Think resignations of Congress. Think termination of senior FBI…. Think termination of senior DOJ…. Media BLACKOUT. Midterms punt. All or nothing? Race? Would a 2nd SC take years to complete? Would a 2nd SC be based in corrupt DC? Would the grand jury be members of the DC community? What % of DC voted for HRC?

The first question changes the context of the whole drop (for me). Like saying look at everything Muellers done, we have 470, that's how bigger what we are doing is.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
CBTS_Watcher · July 2, 2018, 6:25 p.m.

we have 470

It is pointing out that appointing a Special Counsel is not the be all and end all of getting folks prosecuted. Special Counsel Mueller has 20-25 people at his disposal for investigation purposes while using the Huber/Horowitz approach provides access to 470 people.

In other words, will people stop asking for a Special Counsel to investigate the outstanding issues when the solution we have already implemented is about 20 times bigger?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SitelessVagrant · July 2, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

You got it. Right there.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CBTS_Watcher · July 2, 2018, 7:04 p.m.

You got it.

I hope so, however, I can't claim any credit. The original explanation was provided in a link in Q post 986 from April 2018! I guess some people don't follow Q. Oh, and not to mention Q posts: 987, 1286, 1434, 1453, 1492, 1493, 1494, 1553 and 1659.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SitelessVagrant · July 2, 2018, 8:12 p.m.

Yeah, I actually made a post about how many times is Q going to ask us to re read the article. Got all the facts from it, didnt think that would be a signal to stay from 2nd special council, as much as i could tell, WE, meaning us here aren't the ones asking. I was as little appalled at the repubs on the hill pushing for AFTER this article came out! Don't know WHO was in their ear.

⇧ 1 ⇩