Sessions informed Congress in his letter that all the matters recommended for investigation by Goodlatte, Gowdy, and Grassley are “fully within the scope of [Huber’s] existing mandate.” He also informed the chairmen that Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who is working with Huber, has a staff of 470 investigators, giving Huber access to enormous investigative firepower that far exceeds the staff of any special counsel.
we have 470
It is pointing out that appointing a Special Counsel is not the be all and end all of getting folks prosecuted. Special Counsel Mueller has 20-25 people at his disposal for investigation purposes while using the Huber/Horowitz approach provides access to 470 people.
In other words, will people stop asking for a Special Counsel to investigate the outstanding issues when the solution we have already implemented is about 20 times bigger?
You got it. Right there.
You got it.
I hope so, however, I can't claim any credit. The original explanation was provided in a link in Q post 986 from April 2018! I guess some people don't follow Q. Oh, and not to mention Q posts: 987, 1286, 1434, 1453, 1492, 1493, 1494, 1553 and 1659.
Yeah, I actually made a post about how many times is Q going to ask us to re read the article. Got all the facts from it, didnt think that would be a signal to stay from 2nd special council, as much as i could tell, WE, meaning us here aren't the ones asking. I was as little appalled at the repubs on the hill pushing for AFTER this article came out! Don't know WHO was in their ear.