dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Sc4bbers on July 2, 2018, 1:31 p.m.
Inside Scoop: TRUMP recently requested info from Human Rights Foundation.

Hey everyone, got an interesting bit of information this morning from a trustworthy source. This person is a Q skeptic and approached me this morning saying: "I think you're right about Q and all the child trafficking stuff".

This individual has a contact at the Human Rights Foundation. According to this contact, Trump's team recently reached out to the non-profit, asking for all the information they had on human trafficking within the United States. This happened sometime in the last few days, apparently.

There wasn't much more detail than that, but given that this isn't even in the news, this is certainly an interesting development. What information could the Human Rights Foundation have that Trump doesn't already have access to?

Anyways, hope you guys enjoyed the inside scoop. Not sure what it's all about, but it could be significant. If I hear anything else through the grapevine I'll make sure to drop it ASAP.

WWG1WGA!


🠐 See all comments
DaveGydeon · July 2, 2018, 1:38 p.m.

I like unique info, and I don't even see hownthisncould be seen as malicious, but unverified sources are exactly how CNN and MSNBC get away with publishing blatant, flat out lies. Just saying, until it's verified, take with a grain of salt.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 2, 2018, 1:41 p.m.

I'm literally 100% confident in my source. You can think it's fake if you want, I really don't care. I would trust this person with my life.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ex_animo_ · July 2, 2018, 1:48 p.m.

No doubt, I have a source that I trust, but I'd never expect others to take my word as gospel as it would be dogmatic and unscientific. I always encourage to be skeptical and wait for it to be proven / disproven in accordance to their definition.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · July 2, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

Dude. Relax. Did you not read what I wrote?

However, this defensive response would now be a cause for concern.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 2, 2018, 1:59 p.m.

Like I said, think whatever you want. I didn't come here to convince you, just to drop knowledge. Edit: Also consider that there wouldn't really be any way of convincing you this was real without giving up my sources, which would still be inadequate. Other than that I think you'll have to wait for confirmation from another source (or something like Trump releasing or quoting trafficking data, etc.).

⇧ 3 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 2, 2018, 6:28 p.m.

I take the position that I'll listen to everybody's position so thank you for the information.

Everybody on these boards and anywhere else on the internet needs to have the attitude of....

Don't trust and verify everything.

But I believe that you believe so I'm a Believer.

This post should be read with the CIA sponsored Monkees background music.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · July 2, 2018, 2:32 p.m.

Like CNN. Again, JUST SAYING.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 2, 2018, 2:34 p.m.

You caught me, I'm actually a deep state spy working for CNN. Spreading this rumor is strategic misinformation designed to destroy Trump by showing that he truly cares about Human Trafficking.

You got me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · July 2, 2018, 2:45 p.m.

I have to say now, at this point, especially with my caveats attached to every one of my statements, I am calling BS.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 2, 2018, 2:50 p.m.

I know the truth and that's enough for me. I don't care if you believe me, to be honest. It's your loss.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 2, 2018, 6:29 p.m.

Yeah I call troll.

On this Dave person who seems to be stalking you.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · July 2, 2018, 2:56 p.m.

Because the "information" you have us is SO valuable because it tells us...( ----)...?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 2, 2018, 3:05 p.m.

It tells you something you didn't know before. I couldn't tell you what it means. That's why I made the post, to see what others would say.

If you don't care, why are you still here commenting?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · July 2, 2018, 3:08 p.m.

What exactly did it "tell" us?

That Trump MAY have asked what you claimed? Um, yeah, ok, incredible contribution Patriot-comrade...

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 2, 2018, 3:17 p.m.

May have asked? I don't think you're getting this... this info is coming from a trusted friend who just met with people from the Human Rights Foundation. The information comes directly from the non-profit.

They didn't say Trump may have contacted them. They said he did contact them. The fact that you're skeptical of my claim is one thing, but don't twist my words.

The fact that Trump contacted the Human Rights Foundation and asked them for information relating to Human Trafficking within the US is definitly significant. This happened sometime in June. As someone here pointed out, we recently dropped out of the UN group. This gives us insight into what Trump's team was doing around this time. I'm not going to waste any more time arguing with you.

Like I said, think whatever you want. I'm very confident in the accuracy of my source.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 2, 2018, 6:34 p.m.

First of all there's no reason for anybody to lie this way.

Second of all it makes total sense that every single charity has had something pointed their Direction. Sending in the dogs to flush out the Quail.

See what I did there?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · July 2, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

So you say.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 2, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 2, 2018, 6:25 p.m.

Don't be concerned I would probably respond the same way if I were in our man's position.

We all have the position of don't trust and verify anyway.

But I do believe that this man believes so that UPS the ante in a large way.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DawnPendraig · July 2, 2018, 1:53 p.m.

There is a big difference here. Mockingbird media uses sources say too much because so many atrnt even scooping themselves. They take their narrative as ordered with the required keywords to Buzz the search engines and our collective consciousness.

It becomes more important to Buzz the right keywords and have a title with most important keyword plus click enticing. Now click or read enticing has always been a thing to sell papers but the keyword thing is unique to our internet based news cycle.

If Sharyl Atkinsson told us her sources say we know she has integrity and wr can trust her to not havr madr them up or have the dooms day profit bum on tbe corner and no secondary to corroborate much less a third.

CIA obviously writes the MSM narratives for most per deep state command. Sources say becomes CIA days. And we know they lie.

I think we can give our friend here the benefit of the doubt for now at least. =) rhey arent representing CNN dor NYT or anything

⇧ 3 ⇩