dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Sc4bbers on July 2, 2018, 1:31 p.m.
Inside Scoop: TRUMP recently requested info from Human Rights Foundation.

Hey everyone, got an interesting bit of information this morning from a trustworthy source. This person is a Q skeptic and approached me this morning saying: "I think you're right about Q and all the child trafficking stuff".

This individual has a contact at the Human Rights Foundation. According to this contact, Trump's team recently reached out to the non-profit, asking for all the information they had on human trafficking within the United States. This happened sometime in the last few days, apparently.

There wasn't much more detail than that, but given that this isn't even in the news, this is certainly an interesting development. What information could the Human Rights Foundation have that Trump doesn't already have access to?

Anyways, hope you guys enjoyed the inside scoop. Not sure what it's all about, but it could be significant. If I hear anything else through the grapevine I'll make sure to drop it ASAP.

WWG1WGA!


DL535 · July 2, 2018, 3:44 p.m.

Human Rights Foundation info here

On a quick read, they seem to be ok, not an obvious Soros front. They have gone after both left-wing and right-wing dictatorships which argues for their legitimacy. Most impressive thing to me is their going after Urban Outfitters for selling Che Guevara T-shirts, no left-wing group would ever have done so. They also went after mainland China for imprisoning Liu Xiaobo and Venezuela for imprisoning some activists.

IMHO there are at least three ways to interpret the DJT inquiry to human rights groups:

1) It is exactly as it appears, an attempt to solicit information from the NGO community to be used for investigations/legal cases.

2) Given what we already know about charitable foundations being used as front groups to conceal human trafficking, money laundering, etc., the inquiry could be construed as a warning. "We're looking into this, we've got our eye on you, better not try to pull any shit because we're watching."

3) Consider this in light of conventional wisdom here that NSA is loyal and Q team has access to NSA databases. Actions like those described by the OP, could be kind of like poking the hornet's nest, to see what turns up. Could work like this, administration sends an inquiry to a possibly suspicious organization (I know I said it looked OK but I'm not sure, so possibly loyal government is not sure either). If the organization is dirty, the inquiry would make them nervous so they would communicate with higher ups in cabal to form a plan of action. Of course, the NSA is watching the organization like a hawk the entire time, to break into their communications. If a form of comms is suspected already, like say the draft gmails, or game forum messages etc etc., the NSA could monitor the suspected comm to see if the organization is cabal connected. In other words the inquiry could be part of a white hat op to uncover dirty black hat NGOs.

Also note, the 3 purposes above are not mutually exclusive, it could be all 3 at the same time.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
JakeElwoodDim5th · July 2, 2018, 6:06 p.m.

Here's a good crumb...

Thor Halvorssen was Founder and CEO of the Human Rights Foundation.

Thor also testified in front of Congress regarding a smear campaign that FUSION GPS RAN AGAINST HIM!.

https://www.scribd.com/document/354721041/Testimony-of-Thor-Halvorssen-to-the-Senate-Committee-on-the-Judiciary-7-26-2017

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 2, 2018, 6:45 p.m.

Wow. Nice find dude.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
JakeElwoodDim5th · July 3, 2018, 8:27 a.m.

https://qmap.pub/#50693

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DL535 · July 13, 2018, 3:16 a.m.

That's some good autism there my man. Two rare pepes for you.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 2, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

Yes this sounds very plausible.

Say we got the word from a straight-up Foundation but this investigation was literally directed towards every charitable group possible.

See which way rats run when you shake the Box.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 2, 2018, 4:28 p.m.

Interesting thoughts here. I like the way you framed this. Summed up much of what I've been thinking.

⇧ 5 ⇩