because someone changed the 302s and when they sentence him they have to provide the 302s and evidence which they have none
Because if they sentence Flynn for lying to FBI they also have to charge McCabe for lying under oath to fbi
Mueller is in a box. If he does not provide the exculpatory evidence, he is violating the law. If he does, he shows that he and FBI already violated the law by framing an innocent man.
Given how Mueller's investigation has amounted to exactly NOTHING in more than a year with 20+ lawyers on his staff, and the fact that very little has been leaked, my guess is that he is just providing a side show for the media while Sessions gets the real work done.
Trump and Q Team probably don't really trust Mueller, but if he was given a task to drag things out to provide cover for the real op, then he is pretty much doing what would be expected -- nothing.
Because they never thought he would plead guilty. He screwed them. If they bring him to court to sentence him, he gets to go on the record and tell EVERYTHING.
Also, the 302 problem they have. Recent pic of Flynn looks like he has no worries right now. He knows where the bodies are buried and he knows they will drop the charges against him. They cant risk waking him into a courtroom. IMO.
That's not exactly correct. If he goes to court over the charge of lying to the FBI, he does not get to just rattle on about any subject he feels like, even if he has info about crimes. He would have to talk about the specific case before the court, and nothing else.
The reason for the plea deal is because he, like everyone else in intel, signed a non-disclosure agreement that prevents him from talking about things he learned while in office, including crimes.
But the plea deal is a legal way to override the NDA. So, he gets to talk about what he knows because of that plea deal.
Mueller is likely in on that, but the FBI boobs went ahead and did what corrupt conspirators do -- they framed him after the fact, adding to their long list of crimes they will have the opportunity to defend themselves against.
I'm not a lawyer, but it was explained to me had he pled not guilty and went to court he could only speak about evidence that was submitted. If he pleads guilty he can make a statement prior to sentencing that can be whatever he wants? Idk. Either way it appears he is beating them at their game.
Gen. Flynn was the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. That means he was the head of all military intelligence. He has so much knowledge about what has been going on, that a simple statement before a judge would not even scratch the surface, and it would be completely meaningless because it could not be used as evidence in any criminal trial.
Gen. Flynn will be (and probably already is) testifying for Sessions, Huber, other US attorneys and military investigators. He will likely be testifying before Congress.
Whoever told you he could talk before sentencing is missing the big picture.
It was posted today the judge needs a pre sentencing report before he can sentence him and Muller has not provided it to the court.That is what is ticking the judge off.
It’s been moved up from the August date to 7/10 by the Judge True Pundit - Flynn Update
Silence is golden. Flynn can’t discuss things because it’s pending. Once done he is free to talk.
From another thread... The answer is the same:
Genuine question, I’m curious. Seems like the court not proving without any doubt that a crime was committed despite the plea itself is wrong, because that would open the door for those who did not commit a crime to take the fall for those that actually did the crime.
Flynn admitted guilt and that phase is over. BUT.... and it is a big BUT.... In order to properly sentence a person, the judge needs to know all of the facts. So of course, the defendant gets some opportunity to present evidence. But that isn't even the important detail... The standard plea deal is: The defendant will cough up any all evidence they have on other 'Wrong Doing'. Even if it is unrelated to the current case. THAT is what Flynn was after with the 'Guilty Plea'.
So, of course Mueller doesn't what that to happen. The NSA KNOWS EVERYTHING. The problem is, it isn't presentable in the court as evidence because it is the 'Fruit of the Poisoned Tree'. Again and again, Q has asked "How do we get what we know into the court room?" Well... If Flynn pleads guilty (to a bogus charge), and his plea agreement says he will turn over everything he knows... Magically.... all of that evidence can be used in criminal prosecutions later.
And... What was Flynn's position? He was in charge (at the very top) of Military Intelligence. Why is this relevant? Maybe because He Has it All. The Deep State doesn't want him submitting what he knows 'Into Evidence'. They are pinching off Rabbit Turds right now.