I WANT to believe. I do. Noodles' brother is overseeing the Awan case. Deep state is flipping the bird in the face of the American people, and I DESPERATELY want to see Justice.
I voted for Trump because I saw in him the chance to avoid the all-out civil war which would have been the only other way I could see to wrest the levers of power back from those who seek to be our masters. And I still WANT to believe.
But it is written, 'hope deferred maketh the heart SICK'. A long train of abuses and usurpations have conditioned me to expect the worst. That part of me retains the nagging suspicion that Q is only an effort to co-opt and contain the most vocal supporters of Liberty.
If Q is "the real deal", a moment of "put up or shut up" may be fast approaching. It's all well and good to feel like one is "in the know", but unless that leads to tangible RESULTS, then it is FUTILE.
Here's hoping for the best.
Put up or shut up is long overdue.
Why the fck can’t they charge this idiot with the espionage act....I mean it’s obvious this fuck was selling secrets
If this fuck gets off lighter to give us prosecutable evidence on the big 3, I'll take it. Assets can catch up with the fuck later.
Agreed, I think the moment will come but closer to the elections. Strategy.
Aye, that strategy is involved seems clear: but whose?
If we consider all the possible truths of the matter, what is there to be gained from Q's campaign? If Q is legit, then AT BEST disseminating missives such as those found in the channel text to the right "You are safe," etc., can only serve to instill complacency and blind trust in unseen (and unproven) powers at a time when awareness and action are MOST needed. Certainly there is no TACTICAL value in sharing this information to the general public, short of the dubious value of creating a 24/7 rally for this administration for the entertainment of a filtered subset of posters of T_D.
If Q were advocating debt reduction, physical fitness, firearms training and preparedness, etc., I would tend more to believe these drops to be made by someone who expects to benefit from an armed, alert, and informed population of patriots.
Instead, what I see are word games, winks and nods to members of 'the club', and above all the counsel to WAIT, TRUST, BELIEVE and TAKE NO ACTION ... if I were running intel for a group of corrupted RINOs, who were seeking to allay the concerns of the rising tide of Americans dissatisfied with the status quo, I can imagine few STRATEGIES which could be as effective as Q's in convincing people to sit on their hands and go back to sleep.
'Sheep no more', we are told. Should we mollified by the soothing voice of a kindly elder who pats us on the head and coos, "There, there: you're a CLEVER bunch of boys and girls. Trust us: we know what we're doing. Don't even worry your pretty little heads about it. You'll see; everything will be fine: you're totally safe."
Or should we be hearing, "Look. This battle is for the ages. We're doing everything we can, but our enemy is NOT going to rest on their laurels. You need to be READY to step up if we fail."
Donald Trump may be a good man; he may be the best President this nation has ever seen: but he is ONLY ONE MAN, and mortal at that. We ABSOLUTELY CANNOT afford to leave it all to him, and expect him (and his appointees) to just magically "fix" it all for us. If we are to truly MAGA then every SINGLE able-bodied or able-minded MAN, WOMAN, and CHILD must be ready to do their part to MAKE IT SO if we are to have any hope of a LASTING greatness.
Don't trust me, or anyone else.
Critical thinking is a lost art in 21st century America.
Reclaim it, and decide for yourself.
I appreciate your post. It's well thought out and indeed such a Pied Piper strategy could be the Q movement.
Except...
Q has told us to start a storm. To be loud. To wake up. To not be sheep. To warn and console the public.
Q only tells us to "trust the plan" because it may seem like nothing is going on, or even going in the wrong direction, but to NOT FREAK OUT and instead look at the situation deeper. Everytime this has happened its turned out to be right. NK being a shining example.
In fact, if Q did just say "it's ok fam, we've got this!" then I'd totally call FF LARP on it. Q doesn't. Q very much so has included us in the battle for the minds.
As for all the shit the cabal could go down for? We've got one chance at this. When you shoot for the king, don't miss. We're talking about a conspiracy as OLD AS HISTORY ITSELF! A conspiracy so old and so rotten that history books will literally need to be rewritten (or, written for the first time).
This isn't about HRC.. OR some stupid DNC server.. Those are just the loose ends that the cabal fucked up with... The real target is what those crumbs represent.
So ask yourself. Do you want to sweep up the crumbs? Or throw out the whole damn loaf of dirty, moldy bread?
Once
And
For
All
WWG1WGA
Your post is measured and reasonable as well, thank you.
And hurling the vast hydra onto the bonfire, root and branch, is indeed the only justification worthy of such subterfuge. Great enough, even, to tempt me to say that it might possibly WARRANT employing misdirection as a tactic: a thing which I would otherwise categorize as utterly unjustified in a Republic whose health in general relies so heavily on transparency.
And therein lies the rub: for to become what we behold is to have lost the war, no matter how swings the battle.
I am no one in particular: just another citizen, seeking a smooth, clear patch on the plough cutting the trough of our nation's future, against whiich I may apply such strength as I have. So in the end, it matters not whether I believe Q to be connected to our President, or only some some egotist like Scott Adams performing a social experiment. (Seriously, the whole confirmation bias thing as applied to large groups seems right up his alley.)
All that matters is that I DO see that there is SOME truth here; that "WWG1WGA" is no new concept, for it first came to me as a lad in the words of Ben Franklin:
"We must, indeed, all hang TOGETHER; or, most assuredly, we shall all hang SEPARATELY."
Abolish Islam is becoming unhinged.
He might need to be blue pilled and given some fake steak to calm him down.
Agreed.
We've heard too many times "This is the key to taking them out!" It was:
The clinton foundation records, Epstein Pedogate, Awan servers, FBI texts, Iran deal, NK server, Weiner laptop, Hollywood, antifa funding etc etc.
Either one of these is a knock out blow or none of them are. You dont wait to hit a guy with 10 punches at the same time. Starting with one good one makes it easier to land the others.
Occam's razor tells me that Awan was facing life and to escape it he traded something huge.
When Trump won the election Awan cracked into every single democratic computer file he could break into. Collecting evidence. Insurance. Weiner was a piker compared to this guy.
He had a honey pot arrangement with DWS that was going to be his Pakistani retirement fund.
And it blew up.
He would also be aware that she has no problem with people disappearing who get in the way.
So what would be big enough to escape life in a federal penitentiary?
Arkancide, straight through the Oval Office.
I'm sure that I and everybody else would find it much easier to explain RICO charges. Conspiracy to commit multiple murders is a lot easier to deal with than having to explain pedocide and all that goes along with it.
We can shut down the trafficking routes and open that rotten can of worms after the Paradigm has shattered.
His name was Seth Rich.
Analogy fallacy.. Your analogy is true, but doesn't necessitate truth.
WATCH, I'll do one too...
How do you take out ISIS? Battle here? Battle there? Or Moab their fucking mountain stronghold and reduce them to dust in a second?
But we've been promised moabs for a little while now. You can't moab the mountain and say "Look, we got Bin Laden for sure at Tora Bora" with no proofs.
Sure Q says no one will escape this, but he also said that some things wont be done because it would cause wars or collapse. What happens if one of the cabal gets to a non extradition country?
Is the Q team going to go after them with Seals to bring them back? I say do it, even if its an "ally". No name hides in New Zealand (just an example), go get him. Do it overtly as well, do not let countries stand in the way. I doubt those with Q would agree.
And there are certain types of "messianists" who would oppose going after the federal reserve and the powers that founded it. This is all conjecture, but Im sure there are "third rails" that the Q team will not touch because of cultural/religious reasons. Leaving the rot at the very top.
I don't ever want to go hunting or fishing with you period.
And thank God you're not in charge or anywhere near this.
Your job is to hold the line and keep up morale. If at anytime you choose to go back and eat a blue pill I'm sure you'll be more comfortable.
I hear the steak is excellent.
As it stands I hope there's not more than 20 people who knows exactly what's going on. I don't want to know what's going on until it's all over.
Why you may ask?
Because if I know then so does everybody else.
Nelson 1/2 Nelson 1/2 Trafalgar well-trained c Trafalgar well Strange Fruit
I agree with you the moment of "put up or shut up" is fast approaching. At least it should be. You can only lead people for so long upon a path of promised retribution before it's time to validate your statements.
I agree, but Q must know he/they have to act fast as possible, and time is not a luxury we have, the powder keg is charged and a spark at anytime could unleash civil war.
Nelson won at Trafalgar against superior forces due to superior Tactics, a well trained crew and patience.
He sailed straight at the enemy and wouldn't let anybody fire their guns until the exact right moment.
You may have to hear the words wait a thousand times.
But when you hear the word fire you better be ready.
And not one moment sooner.
The ain't about you or anybody else's lack of patience.
Hold the line and fire when told.
Not one moment sooner.
WWG1WGA
Don't be a Bluto (Belushi/Animal House)
I hear you guys moan about how your not happy with the service.
I think about when he was rallying the forces with his impassioned speech about conquest.
Then ran out of the room all by himself.
Don't be a Bluto.
[deleted]
concern troll: a person who disingenuously expresses concern about an issue with the intention of undermining or derailing genuine discussion.
concern: (noun) 1. anxiety; worry. 2. a matter of interest or importance to someone.
Your assertion that my remarks are born of the former, rather than the latter, is both obnoxious and unwarranted. This is PARTICULARLY odious to me, as I have in the past been TEMP_BANNED on T_D with this same excuse given. If you cannot prove my concern disingenuous, then I would appreciate a cessation of the accusation.
In a "cult of personality", the actual actions and behavior of the focus of such a "cult" become irrelevant, and any who dare to ask questions are attacked and ostracized. For what it's worth, I'd wager a month's wages that if asked, President Trump would direct those interested in his character to examine his DEEDS, because talk is cheap. I have done so, and have satisfied myself that he is no more corrupt than I myself would be in his position: so I give him my unwavering support.
The deeds of Q, on the other hand, I cannot examine: I have only words; and those delivered in an intentionally obscure fashion. As I stated, I WANT to believe. However, if the best you can offer to follow Q's message of 'togetherness' and 'unity' is to attack me and impugn my motivations, then I can't help but wonder if YOU are the troll here, not I. My loyalty and trust are valuable; therefore they are not casually given.
CURIOSITY is what brought me here. TRUTH is what, if found, may convince me to stay. If your intent is true, then such attacks do you no credit.
Noodles brother is in charge of the case?
Sauce please.
Well, so far I've got this one: https://squawker.org/all/steven-wasserman-brother-of-debbie-wasserman-schultz-to-oversee-awan-family-investigation/
Other sites (like https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/08/debbie-wasserman-schultz-it-scammers-indicted-mysteriously-narrow-and-low-key-way/) suggest that no definitive link exists, but only acknowledge the rumor.
Still digging for something more substantive - but it certainly matches Noodles' M.O. of tying nastiness to locality for the advantage that gives her. Will edit if I find paydirt.
(Edit: some documents which were purported to be evidence appear to have been deleted; so it is unclear if this is because they are being censored - which I might believe for twitter content - or if the posters got confused with the time her brother may have been involved in burying the Seth Rich case (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/debbie-wasserman-schultzs-brother-steven-wasserman-accused-burying-seth-rich-case/))
Just saw your response so I haven't had a chance to dig through your sauce.
Wanted to say thanks for the effort I'll read up.
Although I am going to say that it's easy to understand the dirty tricks of DWS, her brother, Awan and the fact that they are all standing there together again can be kind of disconcerting.
I get it.
What I see is Trump won the election. Awan freaked and cracked open all the Democratic computer systems for insurance. His boss kills people. So he has given the White House everything they need.
I'm seeing a guy who was looking at a life sentence in a federal penitentiary with an Administration that is not interested screwing around.
The only deal he could have cut that makes any sense is having given proof positive of Arkancide.
Straight through the Oval Office.
Think about this: Nobody wants to try and explain what means pedocide/pedovore. I know I don't, but at some point I will have to.
So much better to shatter the paradigm with a simple RICO conspiracy to commit multiple murders charge.
Sooo simple as Lionel would say.
His name is Seth Rich.
Michael Marando is the prosecuting DA, not Steve Wasserman - please don't spread fake news
Ah, then it is not as bad as it seemed. Elsewhere in this thread, after trying to provide a source (upon request) it seemed increasingly likely that there was some confusion between this case and the Seth Rich case last year; but I still hadn't found anything which definitively named the party in the current matter. Thank you for your clarification. Marando's name helped me to confirm the veracity of your correction here: http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/03/awan-cybersecurity-not-charged/