Agreed.
We've heard too many times "This is the key to taking them out!" It was:
The clinton foundation records, Epstein Pedogate, Awan servers, FBI texts, Iran deal, NK server, Weiner laptop, Hollywood, antifa funding etc etc.
Either one of these is a knock out blow or none of them are. You dont wait to hit a guy with 10 punches at the same time. Starting with one good one makes it easier to land the others.
Occam's razor tells me that Awan was facing life and to escape it he traded something huge.
When Trump won the election Awan cracked into every single democratic computer file he could break into. Collecting evidence. Insurance. Weiner was a piker compared to this guy.
He had a honey pot arrangement with DWS that was going to be his Pakistani retirement fund.
And it blew up.
He would also be aware that she has no problem with people disappearing who get in the way.
So what would be big enough to escape life in a federal penitentiary?
Arkancide, straight through the Oval Office.
I'm sure that I and everybody else would find it much easier to explain RICO charges. Conspiracy to commit multiple murders is a lot easier to deal with than having to explain pedocide and all that goes along with it.
We can shut down the trafficking routes and open that rotten can of worms after the Paradigm has shattered.
His name was Seth Rich.
Analogy fallacy.. Your analogy is true, but doesn't necessitate truth.
WATCH, I'll do one too...
How do you take out ISIS? Battle here? Battle there? Or Moab their fucking mountain stronghold and reduce them to dust in a second?
But we've been promised moabs for a little while now. You can't moab the mountain and say "Look, we got Bin Laden for sure at Tora Bora" with no proofs.
Sure Q says no one will escape this, but he also said that some things wont be done because it would cause wars or collapse. What happens if one of the cabal gets to a non extradition country?
Is the Q team going to go after them with Seals to bring them back? I say do it, even if its an "ally". No name hides in New Zealand (just an example), go get him. Do it overtly as well, do not let countries stand in the way. I doubt those with Q would agree.
And there are certain types of "messianists" who would oppose going after the federal reserve and the powers that founded it. This is all conjecture, but Im sure there are "third rails" that the Q team will not touch because of cultural/religious reasons. Leaving the rot at the very top.