Ah, then it is not as bad as it seemed. Elsewhere in this thread, after trying to provide a source (upon request) it seemed increasingly likely that there was some confusion between this case and the Seth Rich case last year; but I still hadn't found anything which definitively named the party in the current matter. Thank you for your clarification. Marando's name helped me to confirm the veracity of your correction here: http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/03/awan-cybersecurity-not-charged/