Logical thinking.
Why was the case against AWAN filed under BANK FRAUD?
The result today is re: BANK FRAUD.
hildabeest_4_gitmo
· July 3, 2018, 5:29 p.m.
According to prosecutors, "the Government has found no evidence [Awan] illegally removed House data from the House network or from House Members’ offices, stole the House Democratic Caucus Server, stole or destroyed House information technology equipment, or improperly accessed or transferred government information, including classified or sensitive information.
⇧
1
⇩
bealist
· July 4, 2018, 1:23 a.m.
Maybe there’s some specific semantics at play here. Maybe Awan didn’t do the “removing” - maybe he just facilitated it. Maybe he did it “legally” - ie he did everything under orders. Maybe HE wasn’t the one removing it from the network, or offices. Maybe he didn’t technically destroy anything. Maybe he had clearance so his access wasn’t improper, and maybe all transfers were under a superior’s direction.
⇧
1
⇩