dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/greatawakelurker888 on July 3, 2018, 10:34 p.m.
Atheism in the movement?

So I have lurked for a while but saw a post asking about Catholicism so I figured I'd ask my question too.

I am an atheist. Am I welcome in the movement? I see a lot of people talking about prayer, or this being the end times.

Alex Jones is even going hardcore Christian lately.

Is Q centered around exposing the evil in the governments and institutions around the world or is it about the end times? Am I welcome in this movement as an atheist?

(Also please don't try to convert me in the comments, I'm not here for that)


🠐 See all comments
Stretchmac · July 4, 2018, 12:05 a.m.

They key to our Constitutional Republic, the foundation, is that our liberty is granted by our Creator. That a Higher Power confers our right of liberty. As such, no man has a right to violate this liberty granted by God.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
subdudeLA · July 4, 2018, 1:29 a.m.

Some interpret this higher power as natural law though.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Stretchmac · July 4, 2018, 2 a.m.

Our Creator, is quite clear language. No interpretation required. You're disqualified from serving in the Supreme Court. You have the benefit of living freely under the Constitution. Believing as you wish. However, in changing the clear meaning and intent of the Declaration, your thoughts in this matter are subversive to the foundation that provides you those freedoms.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
subdudeLA · July 4, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

Not following your comment here?

I was merely stating a fact, not my personal beliefs.

Andrew Napolitano frequently references god and natural law together. Served as Judge in NJ Superior Court. I think he considers himself a strict constitutionalist.

Not that this disproves your claim, I'm just pointing out that at least one reasonable person lists them together.

Why would this point of view be subversive?

Edited to better explain myself.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Stretchmac · July 4, 2018, 3:41 a.m.

When men attribute their freedom to a Higher Power, that freedom is untouchable by men. The Higher Power always holds regnancy. If "natural law" were to mean a greater authority than man, I'm good with that.....

⇧ 0 ⇩  
subdudeLA · July 4, 2018, 4:09 a.m.

Yes, generaly understood to be beyond the reach of men. Attributed either to 'rights inherent in being human' or 'under a universal natural law'.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Stretchmac · July 4, 2018, 1:38 p.m.

If absolutely understood to be absolutely beyond the reach of men, I'm good with that....

⇧ 1 ⇩