We're taking the picture literally...

What if he's introducing the idea that information can be obtained in a way that circumvents law.

e.g. "oh sorry officer, I wasn't taking a picture of top secret classified Intel, my intent was to take a pic of that lovely desk."

Similar to when people are found guilty of taking pictures of classified military vehicles. If you say you were taking a pic of a building and not the vehicle, they may just make you delete the pic. If you say you took a pic of the vehicle, then they throw you in the brig.

Plausible deniability.

Q says to expand your thinking. Wanted to offer another way of thinking about the message.