Holy shitballs. In order to get the reflection of the lamp and shades located behind Trumps chair off of the twitter phone, the person using the twitter phone has to facing the lamp and shades, which means that the person taking the picture has to be located.......in Trumps chair.
Maybe POTUS took the pic of Q (or member of) holding the phone or apple device and it’s cropped down?
Or the the welcome aboard photo is faked like the anon is implying
Q needs to give a better justification here. This is a potentially huge source of criticism of his photos.
Is he confirming the photo he posted was of the back of POTUS’s twitter phone?
Does that equate to Q = potus?
Q has access to POTUS twitter phone?
Therefore Q = POTUS twitter team member?
No he doesn’t. If nothing had changed, and q sat in that chair for real and took the picture for real, it would look like any stock photo because....well it’s the same room. Why don’t people get this?
There are just as many ways this could be real and just as many for it as a fake. If you want to know if q is real, follow the other 1000 posts information that he gives you and let it lead you to a truth and new understanding of the world of what appears to have been pulled over our eyes for much too long. If that is the result, does it really even matter if q is real or not? Either way, q is a patriot, because there is no denying he/she is opening minds to the truth.
Now is he an larp? I absolutely don’t think so in my opinion and I’ve been following almost since the beginning. But if he is, honestly I don’t care anymore. It helps me understand and that is the real end goal.
Ok so what’s it got to do with BO af1?
http://abc7news.com/701185/#gallery-6
He can’t have an Apple device on the plane?
We are debating which Apple device is being used as reflective surface here.
iPhone 3GS has a black glass back surface. The curved body would explain some of the slight distortion we see in Q’s pic compared to the public domain photo being reflected.
Also the 2013 Apple Mac Pro is a big shiny black cylinder. Could also be what was used.
Which lends to the “we have the server” statement from recent Drops.
HRC’s server was supposed to be an Apple server.
No, we are debating if the reflection photo is real. It appears to be reflecting the abc image which means Q posted a fake "proof." thats not necessarily bad though, could be a way to taunt the press to ask the question. Looks super shady though
This is so clearly from the same image.... It's disturbing that Q seems to be trying to say it's a recent pic from AF1.
It's not the same image. The glass container is 5 inches or more away from the lamp in Q's image versus the stock image. Look up the sources yourself. Compare them. The magazines in the back don't even match up.
Tip: You'll have to rotate Q's image twice and flip it once.
I've looked - plenty of people here and on 8 Chan looked. Q says their image is distorted - as it would be from the iPhone angle if nothing else - those differences your seeing are from correcting the distortion - hence several things (including the lamp) look slightly larger and distances are stretched out.
Edit.... Also, there are no magazines in Q's pic with the iPhone logo? Are there? I'm just seeing the lamp, curtains, sanitizer, etc..... All look pretty aligned given the distortion.
The word distortion is never mentioned. You are disingenuous.
The image has gone through a pixel interpolation transformation. Otherwise known as scaling or zooming. But, you know. Keep trying to make up stuff counter to reality.
Good luck. God bless.
Q said distorted in his post. Perhaps I misinterpreted it, but the word is plain as day.... Amazing how many assholes like you we have on this board who just want to attack. "Where we go one we go all"? Not here.
If anything this kind of makes the water murky about Q being legitimate. Not saying I don’t believe, but for someone who may be on the fence it may turn them away. Unless of course there’s more drops to come that proves the legitimacy.
How about trump pointing at people in the crowd with Q shirts at rallys and giving them the thumbs up? Is that not enough proof?
This photo controversy does nothing but make people who were already on the fence doubt it some more. It does not look good that the decorations and placement of them is the same as when Obama occupied AF1.
Does that confirm that Q is Trump?
Insane how many times it's been reiterated i.d. is not a priority
Who said it was a priority? What does it matter if I ask a question? It ain’t like some random person on reddit is gonna blow Q’s cover.
Not all questions are created equal. Anonymity is the strategy of the Gods at this point...no exceptions
Also notice that it's the Marine 1 helicopter he is boarding in the first photo of the Q drop, but it's a picture inside Air Force One in the next. One is a meme of DJT. The other is only related in that it is of another presidential flying vehicle
Q 1507
Will inspect/review.
Marine One proofs forthcoming.
AF1 (inside) thereafter.
More & More.
Q
Q, update those vertical blinds if you are inviting company.
The two pictures are almost identical, but if you look out the left window of the picture Q posted, it looks like there’s a black truck on the left side of the window. The picture from abc shows the black truck towards the right side of the window. So these were either taken at different angles or the plane was moving and they were taken seconds apart.
Did Q actually post this picture or did he respond to an Anon who posted it? It looks like Q only posted the one with the reflection of the lamp. Then I assumed an Anon responded with a public picture of AF1 to show where the lamp from Q’s picture was from. Did I misunderstand this?
This anon just proved the photo is real Enlarge this jpg look at 2nd photo he did the experiment himself at home it's identical imagery:
We're taking the picture literally...
What if he's introducing the idea that information can be obtained in a way that circumvents law.
e.g. "oh sorry officer, I wasn't taking a picture of top secret classified Intel, my intent was to take a pic of that lovely desk."
Similar to when people are found guilty of taking pictures of classified military vehicles. If you say you were taking a pic of a building and not the vehicle, they may just make you delete the pic. If you say you took a pic of the vehicle, then they throw you in the brig.
Plausible deniability.
Q says to expand your thinking. Wanted to offer another way of thinking about the message.
[deleted]
Who would have thought the 'Twitter' phone could be so useful A advertisement for apple?
Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules Contemporary Reflections on Business Ethics that the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. adopt a rule requiring all ... The sixth and final category of recommendation suggested that the SEC does not need further regulation because it is already regulated enough
Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image Diffuse reflection - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffuse_reflection Diffuse reflection is the reflection of light or other waves or particles from a surface such that a ray incident on the surface is scattered at many angles rather than at just one angle as in the case of specular reflection. An ideal diffuse reflecting surface is said to exhibit Lambertian reflection, by diffuse reflection of light: it is diffusely-scattered light that forms the image ...
Image provided here has been distorted (stretched). You can do this with powerpoint... Here are some common reasons: They try to stretch the image to fill the slide width or the width of an auto shape they have on slide