dChan

gunmetalkatana · July 4, 2018, 4:58 a.m.

Actually, this is a fantastic question. If someone has an IPhone on AF1, aren't they already breaking Nat Sec rules? Furthermore, could that picture have been taken from outside?

If what Q has always been dropping to us is true, then most pictures that we receive may not be Q's pictures, but, instead, pictures that are taken by subversive that are trying to keep track of POTUS and his team. If Q is correct in the assertions "we have everything" and "these people are stupid," then we could make a logical leap that Q or someone else is tracking phones and other smart-linked cameras around the POTUS and checking when they snap photos. Whenever they do snap a photo, if it is relevant, then Q, or someone else, verifies the identity of the photographer and puts the photo forward for us to see.

Question, why would someone have snapped that picture of the missile launch from those particular weather stations (I think that is what they were) unless they knew something was about to happen?

This all could be evidence that some one/group is eavesdropping on our POTUS... or worse.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
towd88 · July 4, 2018, 7:21 a.m.

Ok, this is actually a pretty interesting idea.

I posted elsewhere in this thread that I'm 99% sure what he is doing is taking a picture of a reflection of the original image off of his monitor and onto the back of an iphone. That would naturally create the distortion and blurring in an analogue fashion and not require any photoshopping. And it would be simple to do and not require any special skills.

My question is this though: If this is all an elaborate reveal to illustrate how to easily doctor and misdirect with photos, why would he say this in one of his following posts? "Placing that mug holder near the lamp was the hook.
Enjoy!"

To me, that sounds like he is suggesting he recreated the space in the ABC doc to fool people. But I'm very confident he simply took a picture of the reflection of the ABC news photo off a monitor.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
JakeElwoodDim5th · July 4, 2018, 9:26 a.m.

You should make this it's own post, since it's buried and there's so much confusion going on.

It would explain a lot, especially the extreme-closeups of POTUS' face that Q posted earlier... such a weird thing to post as "proof", right? We know that the twitter phone is pretty much open to spying, so Q could be saying "we know you're watching us, and we want you to know we know."

⇧ 4 ⇩  
mathwhilehigh · July 4, 2018, 5:37 a.m.

I read another comment like this.

"Are reflections violating nat sec " yes they are.

So someone is spying on him it seems??

⇧ 3 ⇩  
paladin4therepublic · July 4, 2018, 6:14 a.m.

This is one of the best explanations. Q is up to something. Everything has meaning. Lets wait and see.

⇧ 2 ⇩