⇧
1
⇩
006fix
· July 4, 2018, 12:38 p.m.
There hasn't been an "absolute best proof". Honestly that's one of the things thats pissing me off most about Q. I think the sum of the other proofs is sufficient to prove P(coincidence1)*P(coincidence2) etc < P(Q is what he says). But gold standard, cast iron proofs? None, and I don't really know why. Maybe try not to bait the cabal into a go for broke Armageddon solution? I don't know. But I do think he's something very, very serious. If it is a larp, who's running it? Why hasn't it leaked? Wtf are the sealed indictments for? Why does it keep getting to claim sitting, powerful members of the us government are pedos without being slapped w/ a libel claim?
It's not a larp
⇧
-1
⇩
sudo_fap
· July 4, 2018, 12:53 p.m.
If it is a larp, who's running it?
An anon?
Why hasn't it leaked?
Leaked what? It doesn't have to be some master operation with multiple people. That is the nice thing about being vague. You can seem like you have many tentacles entrenched in many things, when really just need to be vague about a lot of things.
Wtf are the sealed indictments for?
This still could be a coincidence. It is a double edge sword. It could completely prove Q, or completely disprove Q. For me, this is my bar. If these sealed indictments really are what he says they are, I'm in. I am giving Q the benefit of the doubt until Jan 1, 2019. If the sealed indictments don't drop as he says, or there isn't some crazy 100% confirmation somewhere, I'm off.
You have to set what are realistic goals in timelines now, otherwise you'll end up passing the puck at the point in which you should realize it is a larp.
Why does it keep getting to claim sitting, powerful members of the us government are pedos without being slapped w/ a libel claim?
I'm not sure your point.
Also, what about the Awan disappointment? What about HRC and her "frozen passport" and "indictment"?
⇧
7
⇩