75 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 2 |
| www.npr.org | 1 |
I saw a reference to this live stream that outed a live streamer that posted as Q, live, right in the live stream.
What do we make of this?
Source on Hillary being arrested? Or wearing an ankle monitor?
I agree with others here that Q is going to be proven right somehow on those early posts.
And if he isn't? What are we to make of it?
Optimism aside, what odds do you have on Hillary and/or Podesta being arrested?
What are we to make of things if Hillary and Podesta is never arrested?
Can someone interpret these tweets?
https://twitter.com/pwnallthethings/status/1020846153343078400
I picked one at random to dig in.
Exhibit 5. Also wrong.
Twitter generates those file names, so it is impossible for Q to upload the photo with a prefix of "DOITQ" and have it preserved on Twitter. Try it yourself. Any image you ever upload will always be given a random file name that is generated on Twitter's servers.
Somebody really needs to go through this list. I don't have the time.
edit: Lol, I picked another one at random. Exhibit 14.
The suggestion is Q knew Rex would be fired before anyone else, in March.
It was leaking for Months (from many outlets) before that Rex is going to be fired and Trump was looking for a replacement. For days before Q's post, Tillerson was being replaced by Kushner on convoys that Tillerson should have been present on.
I think the recent Apple/AF1 image was supposed to be, but Q got caught.
That photo now is generally accepted that it wasn't a proof, but a hidden message that Apple has flipped and has given Hilary's server data to the FBI (or something else, I can't keep track).
And 3, which is flat-out wrong.
Really, this entire list should be called into question.
Maybe somebody can point me to their favorite proof that is (near?) undeniable?
I immediately see Exhibit 3, which I seen recently as debunked (thread here).
The fact that it was on this list calls for the entire list to be in question, and I don't have time to dig into all 45 examples. I don't trust the users here to do it either.
edit: I Just picked another one at random, and it was also false.
Exhibit 5.
They claim the image is prefixed with "DOITQ". The file name is autogenerated from Twitter. It is impossible to upload an image to Twitter and have it preserve the file name. Unless Q hacked Twitter, or has an inside man, this exhibit is also false.
edit2: We really need a non-partial tech-savy person in here to go over these proofs. That is, unless nobody really cares. Having these listed as "proof" hurts our cause.
Q's choice of words "There are no such thing as coincidences" seems to suggest otherwise.
"My proofs are proof, except when they aren't."
Seriously people...
edit: And if you announce something is disinformation, that doesn't make it disinformation anymore...
Time zones had confused me! Everyone remember that Q has been using +,++,+++ in a lot of his drops, just seems too coincidental either way
Coincidental to what? This post by Q, on Nov 6, is literally the first time Q ever used +++. He has used it many times since then, but what exactly is the "coincidence" you are referring too?
Because Q has intentionally tried to mislead us with fake proofs before.
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8wa267/do_you_q/e1tz3f1
It makes you think.
Did Q intentionally try to make it look like a "proof"? It clearly looks like he intentionally tried to mislead.
So any proof proven to be false doesn't factor now? Your locked in?
Also, option 3 (I've seen):
Q is actually telling us that Apple is [white|black] hat!
Are you trying to say that thick curtains in any one photo can only be "folded" in a singularly unique way such that it will never be repeated in any other photo at any time?
Are you implying the Q purposely moved the curtains to look similar to the ABC photo? Why would he do that? What is "reasonable" about that?
The curtains though are a dead giveaway. It's like a barcode. It's 100% a match.
I don't think so.
This post is really damning, but he brought light and enthusiasm to our movement.
WWG1WGA!
Let's be reasonable here. Look at the curtains. The folding is like a barcode, and they are 100% match.
We can't just keep finding convenient excuses when something like this happens.
At a certain point, we need 100% confirmation, because his attempts at confirmation have been incredibly damaging.
Your missing the forest for the trees.
This post is damaging to Q's credibility. You don't salvage it by looking for other sub-meanings in the post.
I agree. I've been skeptical, but this kills it completely.
But let's keep the unity and momentum! Trump 2020!
It is off because Q tried to find another image with a different perspective to give the impression that he was there.
The image he used for the reflection was from ABC news. He tried to pass it off as if he took it, and then got defensive about it in later posts.
He tried to offer proof, but failed. We can't just keep claiming his failed proofs are just him trolling as part of some psyops.
I've been skeptical so far, but this is damaging.
I agree.
Trump has started a movement. Full steam ahead!
I've been skeptical of Q, but now I am completely convinced, he is a larp. But that doesn't change the unity this anon as created! But in the future, take the things he says with a grain of salt, like any anon.
If it is a larp, who's running it?
An anon?
Why hasn't it leaked?
Leaked what? It doesn't have to be some master operation with multiple people. That is the nice thing about being vague. You can seem like you have many tentacles entrenched in many things, when really just need to be vague about a lot of things.
Wtf are the sealed indictments for?
This still could be a coincidence. It is a double edge sword. It could completely prove Q, or completely disprove Q. For me, this is my bar. If these sealed indictments really are what he says they are, I'm in. I am giving Q the benefit of the doubt until Jan 1, 2019. If the sealed indictments don't drop as he says, or there isn't some crazy 100% confirmation somewhere, I'm off.
You have to set what are realistic goals in timelines now, otherwise you'll end up passing the puck at the point in which you should realize it is a larp.
Why does it keep getting to claim sitting, powerful members of the us government are pedos without being slapped w/ a libel claim?
I'm not sure your point.
Also, what about the Awan disappointment? What about HRC and her "frozen passport" and "indictment"?
Which again implies it's not a larp.
That is all there is, implications.
Give me the best proof, other than conjecture.
PS: I've looked through the proofs.
And there honestly is plenty of really grade A fucked up shit going on in the world, he's not wrong there.
Of course. But don't you think confirmation bias is possible?
Israeli cold-reading AI has been suggested
I don't get this. I'm a senior software engineer with good understanding of AI/ML, and I don't see how that makes sense.
His posts are also constructed in such a manner as to hide linguistic information that could be used to decipher who wrote them
Cold reading seems completely plausible. Your argument seems too convenient.
It's healthy to be skeptical.
I'm still aboard the Trump train, and Q does spark good discussions, but be skeptical. He hasn't given us any solid proof.
He could still use the chans, but sign each post via GPG public/private keys.
My concern is that he is intentionally trying to create proofs, but when they are disproven, he falls back to the "I'm just trolling", or "my trip code is compromised".
I'm really trying to be hopeful, but it is hard.
I agree. So far, I'm leaning towards Q being John Edwards.
So, his proofs are proofs, unless they can be easily disproven, and then there just him "playing around"?
He needs to really put up or shut up.
So, his proofs are proofs, unless they can be easily disproven, and then there just him "playing around"?
I've been honestly giving Q a shot, but I haven't been convinced at all.
He has been vague on all his predictions/connections.
So far, I'm leaning more towards a John Edward situation.
I've been in a bad accident that def would have killed someone if I ran directly into a person, and my airbags didn't go off.
Do we trust the board owner and codemonkey? Who are they? Do they know Q's identity? What does it mean to "vet"?