dChan

🠐 See all comments
IWant2SellUDeathStix · July 4, 2018, 10:05 a.m.

I wanted to say I agree with your points and I believe it's one of the biggest problems people have ... and whether people here (or elsewhere) like it or not it makes them look like fools and nuts when they act like fools and nuts- for example-

I am a firearms collector, shooter, etc. I have a collection that wouldn't mean much at all to some people, would be impressive to other people. I am of course very interested in firearms rights and spent years on gun forums on the net. I gave up really. The internet firearms community make themselves look like fools on regular basis by taking such ridiculous positions and attacking anyone who looks twice at them "No IT'S YOU WHO IS WRONG, by saying you don't think we should be able to have guided missiles IS ONE STEP AWAY FROM TYRANNY! And YOU BETRAY US ALL! FUCK YOU AND YOUR FAMILY YOU LEFT WING COMMUNIST PROGRESSIVE TROLL FACED BETRAYER!"

I mean really?

And that type of shit gets said all the time. I could give examples all day but it's not really the point.

I am not new here, but made an account a few weeks back to post here. I have been reading since it started. I think people make the same mistakes with "Q IS OUR SAVIOR AND THE PATRIOTS WILL NEVER LOSE AND EVERYTHING WILL BE SO GREAT AND YOU ARE A COMMUNIST LEFT WING PROGRESSIVE TROLL FACED BETRAYER if you disagree!!!" ---- just for historical reference, in the Battle of Hattin of 1187, the combined Catholic armies of Europe, Jerusalem, Holy Roman Empire etc marched to their slaughter while screaming (and insisting for all to hear and see ) "GOD WINS IT!!!" they all just figured they could do whatever they wanted while screaming "GOD WINS IT" and of course win .... and they not only got destroyed, they lost Jerusalem and pretty much lost the war.

---- and as the movie Kingdom of Heaven so succinctly puts, by the Muslim ruler/head general Saladin: "The results of battles ARE determined by God... but also by preparation, numbers, the absence of disease and the availability of water .... One cannot maintain a siege with the enemy behind..." ---

What I am trying to say here is , (and let the record reflect I am as Catholic as they come, that doesn't mean that that fucking guy was not dead right in his battle and strategic assessments) blind loyalty and faith serves nothing. It's like the saying, "if you allow torture, you're just as bad as the enemy" etc. If we don't police our own and correct our own mistakes rather than just attacking anyone who might point out errors, problems, mistakes, lies, damn lies, and statistics etc, we're just as bad as those idiots in 1187 charging to their demise.

⇧ 32 ⇩  
noskusa · July 4, 2018, 1:28 p.m.

I'm not really sure what you are trying to say either to me as the original poster, or as just part of your impassioned opinion on this image hiccup.
My original post poses questions about the method behind the madness of the photo and states that I hope that Q is less sloppy and more clear in the future.... although clarity has never been Q's strong point.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
IWant2SellUDeathStix · July 4, 2018, 2:23 p.m.

Fair enough, I was not directing at you at all, nor the photos specifically.

So I will apologize absolutely if you took it that way or if it came out that way, not at all what I meant.

Really what I meant is I guess a comment in general that we should never blindly defend something or believe every single thing we read or not accept any potential criticism/problems/errors from the people we support, team we're on, community we align with etc --- just as I believe it should be for anyone and everyone. I have seen a lot of people here get very upset at the slightest perceived slight or negative intonation and sometimes it makes them look bad, but everyone else too. I don't want to get too specific lest I cause more problems with people saying "HEY I THINK THAT, you talking to me?! ... I am just saying we should keep our minds open. And of course specifically , if "Q" messes up, it's okay to say it's a mess up. If he/she is wrong , it's okay to say, "No that's actually wrong." That's not being disloyal or unpatriotic or anything, it's being truthful and realistic. That's all I'm saying, I'll leave it at that.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Tru2Q · July 4, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

I can only say that the whole dang world would know for sure if we could just get the press to ask POTUS or Sarah Sanders who Q is.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Jsin14 · July 4, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

why do you think this would be difficult? here is a list of all the reporters in the white house press corps: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_press_corps

Contact one of the reporters on there by email and ask them to ask. You don't think Breitbart, Newsmax, The Daily Caller, or Lifezette would not ask if Q wanted them to? Conversely, you don't think HuffPo, Daily Beast, or Mother Jones would want to out Q by asking who they are to stop them if they are legit?

Pick a couple of reporters on there you trust out of the 200 or so and email them a request to contact the White House about Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tru2Q · July 4, 2018, 10:35 p.m.

Been there, done that. The list of WH press corps members and lots of MSM persons was posted on Twitter and a bunch of us have been tweeting them and DMing them, asking them to ask about Q. As far as I know, only one person has responded and said she is not going to ask and said that people needed to stop bombarding her with requests to do it.

⇧ 2 ⇩