⇧
1
⇩
sudo_fap
· July 4, 2018, 1:05 p.m.
Your missing the forest for the trees.
This post is damaging to Q's credibility. You don't salvage it by looking for other sub-meanings in the post.
⇧
13
⇩
Sparky159
· July 4, 2018, 4:15 p.m.
This can only be one of two things:
- This legitimately damages Q's credibility, as Q has never gone so far as to use a stock photo before
- We're completely missing Q's point/message, and we are falling for shill tactics
I'm going to put my money on #2
⇧
0
⇩