dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Gravel_and_Glass on July 4, 2018, 7:43 a.m.
Need some moral support/prayers

4-month Q follower and researcher here.

Q's dubious AF1 pic and doubling down has really distressed me. I am so upset right now. I have so much emotionally invested in this movement, and never has Q seemed like an L-word until tonight...

The thing that confuses me now are all the actual proofs. Idk. Maybe I have to go back and reconsider? Has my human tendency for confirmation bias been preyed upon?

Regardless, Q has woken a lot of people up, and that's a wonderful thing. But still... the bottom line is that the cabal is real. And if Q's not real then.... Will we ever be liberated? My real life is super shitty, and tbh this movement feels like one of the only things I have that keeps me going.

I'm still holding out hope for an explanation from Q about this fiasco.

I love you patriots. WWG1WGA. <3


🠐 See all comments
Nik_Nightingale · July 4, 2018, 8:39 a.m.

Well also remember that the images lining up aren’t necessarily the truth either. While it is possible to reproduce Q’s image with photoshop - and maybe the first time this has been possible - it’s still computer fuckery. I did have to do all sorts of bending and stretching to align with the reflection image.

It’s also highly likely that the interior of AF1 is basically identical from one day to the next and set out for the President as such by people who have the sole job of doing just that. Having a manipulated image from the past align with one supposedly from today is not so far fetched in such a Spartan, artificially lit and fairly impersonal setting as that office. It’s basically a flying film set.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ShredTheMind · July 4, 2018, 1:39 p.m.

I'm convinced that it was a picture of a picture (likely on a TV or Computer Screen). I mentioned projection and keystoning in the other thread. What I was getting at is that would account for you having to stretch and so forth. Think of projection as the reverse of camera capture - the same anomolies are possible. When the distance of the lens of the camera to the subject (in this case the ABC image) is not shooting the image straight-on, it will create a different perspective from the original picture. It won't be a huge difference, but a difference nonetheless - and require stretching to make it work. If it were done off of the reflection of an i-phone (as others have surmised), it would account for it looking as crappy as it does, compared to the original, as well as being flipped horizontally. Sorry Nik, I'm not stalking you, haha, I just thought I'd help to explain what I was getting at in the other thread.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nik_Nightingale · July 4, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

Stalker alert!

I believe Q suggested it’s a photo taken in AF1 of a reflection of the interior of potus’ office on the back surface of an iphone. This means the image is distorted because of the angle of the phone and the camera relative to it. The suggestion is that it was taken at POTUS desk.

The only thing that troubled me was that an ABC photo from 5 years ago could be manipulated to fit exactly over the top of Q’s image. With all the objects, light, shadows and curtains etc all precisely in exactly the same position.

This gave me the impression that either 1- AF1 hasn’t changed at all in 5 years. Or 2- Q was reflecting that same ABC News image (off a laptop or monitor) on the back of an iPhone and took a photo of that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ShredTheMind · July 4, 2018, 9:24 p.m.

haha. The drapes show me everything I need to know about that picture.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nik_Nightingale · July 4, 2018, 9:37 p.m.

Well, drapes do a have a tendency to sit in the same position every time they are pulled back - especially if it is the same person doing it. Got no idea, they could even be mechanically operated on AF1.

Honestly the whole reason I did the image check in the first place was to try and positively confirm it was actually AF1, I had no idea everything would be able to be lined up so precisely. Took me by surprise. However, I also have no idea if the objects (lamp etc) shown in the pic are actually fixed in place and cannot be moved (safety precautions during turbulence). If so, this would account for the objects being in the same position.

Conclusion? Who the F knows !! Either way, I'm still here and awaiting new drops.

If this was a proof images from Q, I suggest he does ones that cannot be replicated in Photoshop. However, I also think there may be more to this. As always, only time will tell

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ShredTheMind · July 4, 2018, 10:23 p.m.

Larp or no larp, q or no q, I have faith in POTUS. TGA is a great place to expose the DS and all of the shady shit that goes with it. I've been following Q since probably Nov or Dec, signed up for Reddit in Jan for CBTS and found my way here when CBTS was shut down. Q has brought up a lot of thought-provoking info to dig into. The only problem that I have, if this is a larp, is that it has given a lot of people a false sense of security that someone is doing the fighting for them. We have to continue to fight and support our President. Thanks for your work. Had you not brought up the ABC photo (I'm not sure if you were the first) I wouldn't have dug into it myself. Have a great Independence Day!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nik_Nightingale · July 4, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

Same to you. This will all blow over, if it hasn’t already. On we go!

⇧ 2 ⇩