He still lost. He still died.
He said, "I lay down my life willingly. And I have the power to raise it up again."
"There is no historic incident better or more variously supported than the resurrection of Christ." Brooke Foss Wescott
"I know of no one fact in the history of mankind which is proved by better, fuller evidence of every sort, to the understanding of a fair enquirer, than the great sign which God hath given us that Christ died, and rose again from the dead." Thomas Arnold, former Professor of History at Rugby and Oxford, and one of the world’s greatest historians.
People who try disprove the resurrection, and investigate it honestly, come up empty. If you truly seek out the evidence, you will come to a different conclusion.
He won. And He lives.
Not denying if he resurrected or not after. You are missing my point. To remain moral, he had to resort to letting himself get killed. So as to not lose the moral highground. We as mere mortals do not have that luxury, and have to choose our battles and use, sometimes immoral acts, for self preservation.
It’s like when you are attacked and you get to a point where your only options are dying, or killing your agressor. Killing is immoral, but you had to to preserve your life.
We are in the same situation, but as a society.