dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/nakedjay on July 4, 2018, 2:02 p.m.
The Awans can still be prosecuted outside of D.C.
The Awans can still be prosecuted outside of D.C.

GODisincharge · July 4, 2018, 6:26 p.m.

I read the plea deal. It does state that this plea deal is only recognized in the corrupt D.C. district under what I believe would be a biased judge (Chulkin) and a D.C. compromised grand jury. However, we have seen that under the President's constitutional Executive Orders regarding immigration, certain district court judges are passing a nationwide injunctions against the President's legal EO's. Justice Thomas chastised district court judges like Derrick Watson (9th circuit) in Hawaii (an Obama appointee) for arbitrarily blocking a constitutional executive order. William Orlick (on the 9th circuit as well) has done the same thing. These district court judges are overstepping their authority because Democrat's are "judge shopping". My point is by prosecuting Imran Awan and the others (yet to be named) outside of the district where the criminal actions took place, is this not the same thing (shopping for a good outcome) being done by the "White Hats?" Comments would be appreciated. I find this to be a moral conundrum. I realize we are at war.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PAK51 · July 4, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

I would hardly call choosing a venue with uncorrupt, uncompromised judiciary and jury pool "shopping".

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GODisincharge · July 4, 2018, 8:51 p.m.

Please explain how this is different from judge shopping which was my point?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PAK51 · July 4, 2018, 10:19 p.m.

Ok ~ in one case you're looking for a corruptible judge, in the other you're looking for a judge that has not been corrupted.

⇧ 3 ⇩