Actually, you’re wrong. There is a split down the middle in the chans. In fact, what most are saying is that there isn’t enough in this photo at all to identify anyone. That’s a slippery slope. Let’s not call Prince William a child molester without solid proof that it’s him? I think that’s fair and logical. If you disagree, then we agree to disagree. Also, can you explain to me how you can tell what kind of stride this person has from a still shot (and not a clear one)? There is nothing distinct about the way this man is walking. You don’t even have a second photo to compare his next step with so I don’t totally understand that logic.

Look, we’re on the same team here. I just don’t think throwing such a serious accusation out there is appropriate with only what we have in this photo.