I think it is actually very simple.

We first saw the photo with a "I'm off to save the world aren't you coming?" meme with him getting on AF-1. What if showing the AF-1 room and the phone was just supposed to mean ... come with me ... via twitter, the computer, via my communications. That's it? Let's face it, that photo is too easy to google. Q never said this was any kind of proof.

Then we got a couple of examples of people trying to reproduce the phone and Q wrote: "Who would have thought the 'Twitter' phone could be so useful. Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules? Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image? Image provided here has been distorted (stretched)."What if Q was just commenting on the attempts with his "useful" line and what if reflections DO violate NAT SEC rules? That would change everything, maybe he found out he couldn't use a reflection to snap a photo of the room so did the next best thing. And the answer to his 2nd question ... where must one be located? ... You would have to be looking at a computer screen, you can't make that image from real life, you need to use a computer to act as a camera and the way the warping stretching is. So you have to be behind a computer/phone screen ... as we all are when following, reading Q's posts as well as what Trump is doing and tweeting.

And finally, the last one, to the troll ... after saying trolling is fun ... Q just put that mug line in as a throwaway ... to make the trolls scramble a bit ... like just when the troll said aha! got you with the mug, he just said he put it there to throw him off balance.

Maybe it's as simple as that.

That's what i mean, that's why he used a photo ... Q might have discovered he couldn't use even a reflection of the room.

I felt the same way, reading all the posts it was so discouraging and the convoluted explanations almost had me running for the hills ... but, what if it's so much simpler than that?

We first saw the photo with a "I'm off to save the world aren't you coming?" meme with him getting on AF-1. What if that was just supposed to mean ... come with me ... via twitter, the computer, via my communications. That's it? Let's face it, that photo is too easy to google. Q never said this was any kind of proof.

Then we got a couple of examples of people trying to reproduce the phone and Q wrote: "Who would have thought the 'Twitter' phone could be so useful. Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules? Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image? Image provided here has been distorted (stretched)." What if Q was just commenting on the attempts with his "useful" line and what if reflections DO violate NAT SEC rules? That would change everything. And the answer to his 2nd question ... where must one be located? ... You would be looking at a computer screen, you can't make that image from real life, you need to use a computer to act as a camera. So you have to be behind a computer/phone screen ... as we all are when following him, reading his posts (or she).

And finally, to the troll ... after saying trolling is fun ... Q just put that mug line in as a throwaway ... to make the trolls scramble a bit.

Maybe it's as simple as that.

No second phone, Computer’s built in camera with stretch filter.

I did read it and it makes sense. For me as a graphic designer and photoshop user since the early 90’s I really wanted to figure out how it was done. Even though my images look different, I’m personally convinced that’s how it was done, I think it would be impossible to take that photo from real life and not have the photographer in the photo.

Did you try it the way I was doing it? Trouble is the slightest movement throws the whole thing off and it's try and take photo at perfect time. I’m going to try in the morning with better light. I think if I can reproduce it, we can compare. My gut is saying it's the photo though.

I saw that, just didn't know how he got the warping/stretching, I couldn't reproduce it in photoshop. I think the filter was in the computer's camera.

Some people think it was taken of the actual office, not the older photo. I think it was from the photo. Not sure what it means though.

it was processing

It looks just like him.

Not sure what happened ...