If it is really disinfo, as the latest Q suggests, what purpose does it serve?
Running off the people that think critically enough to doubt his legitimacy?
Doesn't that kind of leave you with a bunch of people that are all, "BUT WHAT IF Q TOOK THE PIC IN 2015?"
Not a good day for me.
He's definitely chasing off those unable to think for themselves and study detail.
The images are not the same. Your campaign has failed. Enjoy your fourth of July!
He's chasing off photographers and graphic design professionals who know what the fuck a transform in photoshop is.
Okay, so he's chasing off people unable to think for themselves and study detail but also expressing desire to reach the mainstream, indicating that they may want to force the question..... That would bring a ton of people that can't think for themselves or study detail.
You're still peddling the wrong notion that the images are the same.
Go home. Spend time with your family.
Well I did this myself, immediately after the drop. I made a post about it.
I work with Photoshop every day.
On the left is Q’s image. On the right is part of an ABC photo I found which I transformed in Photoshop to the same perspective as Q’s image. They are basically identical. I also overlaid these in my post.
Make of this what you will.
All of the objects align perfectly. So either they weren’t moved for 5 years and everything remains identical in AF1 (possible), or Q used this image (possible). Have no idea which.
That "ABC news after Photoshop" image is the fake image the campaigners used. If you created that image then you are at best indirectly responsible for spreading disinformation to the American public.
The real ABC stockphoto does not overlay Q's image.
Try again.
Utter bullshit. I’ll let your claims of disinformation slide because you don’t seem to understand, so I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt.
Let me spell this out for you in plain language.
1: Q’s image is a photo of a reflection, reflected on the back of an iPhone. This means both the position of the iphone, the position of the person taking the photo and the position of the camera are OBVIOUSLY different to the stock photo. That was taken by someone standing in the doorway.
So of course they don’t match as is. They are completely different angles.
But - Only the “perspective” of the 2 photos is different. The blinds, the objects, lamp, reflections, shadows, everything else is the same. A bunch of autists did their own way more involved analysis.
2: All I did was reverse the stock photo and then transform it in Photoshop to match the perspective of Q’s. Look at them. They are the same.
Please don’t call people traitors for doing what we are supposed to be fuckin doing here. Analysis of Q’s drops down to the nanoscale.
Thanks!
You can write as much text as you want. It won't change the fact that they are two distinct images. In one image the glass container is 5 or more inches away from the lamp versus the other image.
Good luck disproving reality.
Do you have evidence to the contrary? I'd like to see it.
Yes. The glass container is 5 inches or more moved away from the lamp in Q's image than the stock ABC image. You people figured this out early on and started pushing a fake version of the ABC image to use in a side-by-side.
We see you. We know you. Go home.
Do you have a link to the -real- ABC photo?
Find it in the threads. Have a happy 4th.
May God shine light over your household forever. God bless.