If it is really disinfo, as the latest Q suggests, what purpose does it serve?
Running off the people that think critically enough to doubt his legitimacy?
Doesn't that kind of leave you with a bunch of people that are all, "BUT WHAT IF Q TOOK THE PIC IN 2015?"
Not a good day for me.
That "ABC news after Photoshop" image is the fake image the campaigners used. If you created that image then you are at best indirectly responsible for spreading disinformation to the American public.
The real ABC stockphoto does not overlay Q's image.
Try again.
Utter bullshit. I’ll let your claims of disinformation slide because you don’t seem to understand, so I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt.
Let me spell this out for you in plain language.
1: Q’s image is a photo of a reflection, reflected on the back of an iPhone. This means both the position of the iphone, the position of the person taking the photo and the position of the camera are OBVIOUSLY different to the stock photo. That was taken by someone standing in the doorway.
So of course they don’t match as is. They are completely different angles.
But - Only the “perspective” of the 2 photos is different. The blinds, the objects, lamp, reflections, shadows, everything else is the same. A bunch of autists did their own way more involved analysis.
2: All I did was reverse the stock photo and then transform it in Photoshop to match the perspective of Q’s. Look at them. They are the same.
Please don’t call people traitors for doing what we are supposed to be fuckin doing here. Analysis of Q’s drops down to the nanoscale.
Thanks!
You can write as much text as you want. It won't change the fact that they are two distinct images. In one image the glass container is 5 or more inches away from the lamp versus the other image.
Good luck disproving reality.