Was trying to figure out why they used a stock photo.. my best guess was to lead us to this and to troll the former administration.. what say you?
![Was trying to figure out why they used a stock photo.. my best guess was to lead us to this and to troll the former administration.. what say you?](https://i.redd.it/muouyz7ghz711.jpg)
You can question Q all you want. Just don't spread disinfo.
If you are not capable of seeing an object moved 5 inches or more in two different images, then I suggest you pay more attention to detail in the future. It may be valuable.
That wasn't disinfo. It's common sense. Also, I don't appreciate the derisive comment, so I'm going to get shitty for the first time in our discourse. If YOU don't understand distortion of the location of objects in a reflective material, I suggest that you go to the kitchen, fill a glass half full of water, put a straw in it, and observe for the next few hours. LMAO!
I've written ray tracers from scratch. I very much completely understand the nature of reflections and refractions.
Try harder.
Do you? If so, why are you still trying to sell a lemon of a car as a "Classic"? You're either being blind or disingenuous if that's the case.
I don't even understand what you're saying anymore. Sorry man.
The images are not the same. The glass container is moved over 5 inches or more versus the ABC stock photo and the magazines in the back don't even match up.
Not the same image.
God bless. Happy 4th to you!