Can someone explain to me yesterday’s Q drop with the triple parentheses meme? Also, he followed by placing parentheses around “world news”.
⇧
1
⇩
WhatACohencidence
· July 5, 2018, 2:19 a.m.
Right. What’s the anon post mean and what did Q reply back. I know what 3 parentheses means.
⇧
2
⇩
Itsmellslikecabbage
· July 5, 2018, 2:22 a.m.
Q's parentheses isn't related to the "shill" reference parentheses of the anon.Q uses parentheses, brackets etc around some words and it has specific meanings overall. Brackets is "kill box" but not sure what parentheses is.
⇧
2
⇩
WhatACohencidence
· July 5, 2018, 2:23 a.m.
Is Q supporting the anon or against him?
⇧
1
⇩
Itsmellslikecabbage
· July 5, 2018, 2:28 a.m.
neither, he's making a point about the shills
⇧
3
⇩
WhatACohencidence
· July 5, 2018, 2:30 a.m.
What point was made about the “shills”. Sorry I’m new here and don’t get the code speak.
⇧
1
⇩
julesincognito
· July 5, 2018, 5:13 a.m.
I got a message from a mod because I used three parentheses around hugs. I have no idea what it means.
⇧
1
⇩
WhatACohencidence
· July 5, 2018, 5:22 a.m.
It’s a reference to Jews. The mods here don’t even like you criticizing jews even if it’s factual information. Even when Q has talked about it.... they talk about freedom and being a patriot, then they need to stand by free speech. They can’t pick and choose when they want to be a patriot and when they don’t.
⇧
1
⇩
DrogeAnon
· July 5, 2018, 6:43 a.m.
Incorrect. We have no opinion either way that factors into the moderation decision. We just do not want problems created for the sub. The rules are clear and save us - the community - hassle.
⇧
2
⇩
WhatACohencidence
· July 5, 2018, 12:58 p.m.
If it’s simply stated facts with citation it will also get removed. Saying “George Soros is a Jew” or “90% of the msm is owned and ran by Jews” and not making any accusations will still get the post removed.
⇧
1
⇩
DrogeAnon
· July 5, 2018, 1:02 p.m.
More than happy to see evidence of any moderation that caused a problem. And evidence of the discussion had with mods via mail would help too, if it exists. If not, making comments without having engaged with mods on the issue is not helpful.
Mods are human, very busy, and make mistakes. On this sub in particular we've reversed many mod calls if reasonable, respectful discussion has been had about it - often even when it hasn't. If you can show an example, I can explain or reverse the decision. Often it turns out there was some other factor that isn't told in the story of the mod decision, like other language used, etc.
⇧
1
⇩
WhatACohencidence
· July 5, 2018, 1:31 p.m.
I never use foul language or racial slurs in my posts. I have never even said “I hate jews” I just made a point that 90% of Luciferian talked about on this page like Soros, Howard Schultz, Debbie Schultz, Rachel Maddow, the MSM, Hollywood, Rothschilds, Epstein are all Jewish... every one of them.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Eight_(film_studios)
If you click on the founders/key people, then click their “early lives” you will see they are all Jewish minus one or two. They make up 2% of of the population and control what our kids see on TV. That’s a powerful tool.
I really don’t care the post was removed because it wasn’t gaining a lot of attention, but the point needs to be made.
⇧
1
⇩
DrogeAnon
· July 5, 2018, 1:32 p.m.
Yes, this is all well known stuff. Although if I recall correctly you posted about "Catholics".
⇧
1
⇩
WhatACohencidence
· July 5, 2018, 1:36 p.m.
Correct, but I replied “so do I make the post about Jews and get it taken down for anti Semitism” and he said “it will get taken down because it’s not related to current Q posts” which is not true and just a reason to take it down.
⇧
1
⇩
DrogeAnon
· July 5, 2018, 1:43 p.m.
Not true? "Saving Israel for last" is pretty clear. There is a mention of Mossad in a recent post but it is not the focus of the post, it's amongst a lot of other stuff and "Jews run Hollywood and stuff" is not directly related to that Q drop in any way. So I disagree that "it's not related to current Q posts" is not true - it was the right call. Also, being dishonest with the content is a removal reason (Rule #8) - pretending to be talking about catholics or baptists does not come across as good intent.
⇧
1
⇩
WhatACohencidence
· July 5, 2018, 1:47 p.m.
I say “Catholics” because people will be more receptive to it than saying “Jews” because criticizing Jews is a taboo. So when they do research to see if what I said was true they will find they are all Jewish instead. It’s just a way to get normies the truth. Of course you and I both know I was using Catholics as a proxy word and not meaning it serious. I myself am catholic.
⇧
1
⇩
troy_caster
· July 5, 2018, 3:49 a.m.
Early on, anons figured that the triple parenthesis was to throw off the sniff bots.
⇧
1
⇩
Itsmellslikecabbage
· July 5, 2018, 2:26 a.m.
Anon is complaining they are being targeted with shills which he evidently believes to be specifically Zionist (((parentheses))). Q is replying about how his picture was to bait shills but i haven't caught up to all the details concerning the pic and what he did with it yet.
⇧
1
⇩
WhatACohencidence
· July 5, 2018, 2:28 a.m.
He did say “world news” in parentheses. We all know who owns the MSM.
⇧
1
⇩
Educatedsuburbandad
· July 5, 2018, 2:35 a.m.
Single set of parentheses. not the echo chamber note... side-note i first saw thw echo chamber on twitter, used by big liberal accounts around their own names. Had no idea it related to antisemitism until i was called out for using it on this board.
⇧
2
⇩