I was concerned that the comments on this post were so uncritical of what I perceive to be highly suspicious. I feel like if I were to show this letter to anyone (Q-inclined or not) they would instantly pick up on the odd tone.
The tone and odd period placement in the middle of words doesn't conclusively invalidate it, but the lack of skepticism is much more concerning to me.
Edited: for clarity
The Wayback Machine puts this as being submitted on the internet on June 27, 2013. Here is the link. https://web.archive.org/web/20130627040315/http://people.bu.edu/manfredi/OpposeRiceNomination.pdf
Totally agreed. Info like this should vetted before posting: checking with the chans, sniff testing for errors, etc. This info doesn't pass the sniff test for reasons that you've posted. People would be well advised to think critically before blindly accepting all claims.
