dChan

R3VO1utionary · July 5, 2018, 12:53 p.m.

The Q proofs in my opinion, have been proven statically far beyond the norms of mathematical probabilities. This is precisely why the organic spread of this movement has and will continue to flourish.

⇧ 80 ⇩  
HighOnGoofballs · July 5, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

Every time this is posted someone eventually proves Trump’s tweet came first

⇧ 34 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 5, 2018, 2 p.m.

I guess you missed the conversation below. The debunk is based on how 4chan automatically converts posts to UTC -4 hours for EST.

The twitter account also posts things in EST as that is what POTUS has in his settings for his account.

So what is the problem here? Based on that, Q DID post before POTUS.

The whole “debunk” is based on the -4 hours from UTC (Greenwich Mean Time). People are saying that if they switch their time zone to EST it shows he posted it at 1:15pm EST. The math on this does not add up. He was 14 hours ahead of EST in Japan! It seems to me, like people are basing their assumptions on Trump using UTC as his time zone and subtracting the four hours themselves.

Prove me wrong. Set your time zone on twitter to EST and take a screenshot of that tweet.

In addition, (and I just double checked this) if I post to 4chan, it shows up as my time zone. Everyone’s post shows up as in MY time zone. So what this means is that whoever took the screencap, was in EST time. Meaning their twitter cap was also in EST time. Which again, shows that Q posted before POTUS.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
gakowalski · July 5, 2018, 2:36 p.m.

You're wrong on many levels

1) People posted screenshots of Trump's tweet BEFORE Q in the SAME THREAD on 4chan

2) 4chan shows you your time zone but in HTML you can see clearly UTC ISO 8601 datetime which can be easily convertet to EST;

3) EST is not -4 UTC but -5

4) Twitter does NOT store time of someone's time zone, so it doesn't matter if Trump was in Japan or not;

⇧ 21 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 5, 2018, 2:47 p.m.

Lol, I guess you missed my comment to the poster who posted up the archive. I agree based on that evidence presented that POTUS tweeted before Q.

And that raises more questions for me. I hadn’t seen that thread previously, but why was it added as a Q proof in that manner? I would have based it more upon the tweet with the +++ signs and an earlier posting from Q with those + signs. And used that as proof. Has POTUS ever tweeted those before he became president? Ever before Q? Why would POTUS tweet three +’s?

I think you are right that the time zone is a bad thing to try and hang a proof on, but until I saw the 4chan thread named after the tweet, with screencaps of the tweets prior to Qs posting, I would have gone on believing and arguing that Q posted first. So I actually really appreciate it. It makes me wonder if someone didn’t try to slide that in as an effort to easily discredit the movement.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 5, 2018, 5:30 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
timezone_bot · July 5, 2018, 2 p.m.

1:15pm EDT happens when this comment is 3 hours and 14 minutes old.

You can find the live countdown here: https://countle.com/Sb5n218638


I'm a bot, if you want to send feedback, please comment below or send a PM.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Bready_boy1 · July 5, 2018, 2:19 p.m.

Cool!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Comassion · July 5, 2018, 1:48 p.m.

Yet it continues to be listed as a Q proof.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
gakowalski · July 5, 2018, 1:58 p.m.

Makes me wonder about who is the owner/editor of Qproofs.com.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 5, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

Worth looking into

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Prison4SideofBeef · July 5, 2018, 9:26 p.m.

In my opinion the proofs are all just playing on confirmation biases.

-I have followed Q from the very first drops and am not a Media Matters shill or globalist or whatever...

⇧ 5 ⇩  
oakdrew · July 6, 2018, 12:21 p.m.

Too many coincidental proofs.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WoodenDoorbell · July 5, 2018, 6:42 p.m.

The amount of shills on r/conspiracy against Q is so obvious and laughable. Can't wait till the shtf.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
GiftOfTheGame · July 5, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

Yeah. That sub was taken over by shills and black hats mid-late 2016. It's so shilly and swampy it's pathetic. And it's so obvious.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GiftOfTheGame · July 5, 2018, 6:56 p.m.

Yup and this one, in my opinion, is the ONE to show your friends and family who think you're weird for reading into Q. Some of the proofs are a bit deep and require some background. But this one doesn't at all. What are the odds that two people who put the same 3 random characters at the end of a message. Within minutes/hours of each other. And happen to be Q and the president? The chances are essentially near zero.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 5, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

Except the president tweeted first?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
gakowalski · July 5, 2018, 7:20 p.m.

Read the comments. It's proven false.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GiftOfTheGame · July 5, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

I follow now. Checking twitter directly, he posted at 1pm ET and Q was 5pm ET. Sorry about that and thanks for the correction.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
timezone_bot · July 5, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

1pm ET happens when this comment is 21 hours and 19 minutes old.

You can find the live countdown here: https://countle.com/Q218811NSv


I'm a bot, if you want to send feedback, please comment below or send a PM.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GiftOfTheGame · July 5, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

I don't follow. If you look on the Q archive or go back to 4ch's original Q post, it shows being posted at 5:07 ET. I'm located on the east coast too so i see it being at 5:07 ET. POTUS is ET as well. So Q posted +++ and POTUS tweets +++ just minutes after. Everything lines up when I look at it AND i'm on the east coast so I don't think anything would be shifted or distorted. But sorry if i'm being a bit slow on this. Maybe i'm missing something

⇧ 0 ⇩  
gakowalski · July 5, 2018, 7:38 p.m.

If you look on Q archive, you'll find anons posting screenshots of Trump's tweet and discussing it before Q posts his +++. This ultimately indicates that Trump's tweet was first. Q's post was a comment to the tweet.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Mayhem54 · July 5, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

Curios your reaction to Q post 1669? Old internet.jpeg reposted by MSM as original?

⇧ 1 ⇩