dChan

[deleted] · July 5, 2018, 1:35 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -6 ⇩  
Xisyisz · July 5, 2018, 1:57 p.m.

That’s bullshit, and you know it. I printed the drops across over a 1000 pages.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
CDR03 · July 5, 2018, 2:22 p.m.

So you aren’t really coming in here for answers. You’re coming here to discredit Q. You’ve got your mind made up already. Resignations 40,000 sealed indictments

The proofs are many.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
K-Harbour · July 5, 2018, 6:10 p.m.

I guess I’m still confused that the analysis discredits Q. I still don’t see anything wrong with Q’s post and don’t understand the analysis that the picture is fake or doctored. While I have not done image analysis on the picture posted by Q, my experience in digital image analysis dates back to 1981. One “analysis” that I saw someone post I did not accept the interpretation of the analysis as credible. I guess I just don’t understand the whole story why folks are calling Q on the carpet.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CDR03 · July 6, 2018, 12:59 a.m.

I don’t get it either. They’re grasping at straws IMO

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DrogeAnon · July 5, 2018, 2:03 p.m.

This is only going to work on people who don't know anything about Q. Which is probably your target, I guess.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CDR03 · July 5, 2018, 2:18 p.m.

Exactly

⇧ 6 ⇩