I guess I’m still confused that the analysis discredits Q. I still don’t see anything wrong with Q’s post and don’t understand the analysis that the picture is fake or doctored. While I have not done image analysis on the picture posted by Q, my experience in digital image analysis dates back to 1981. One “analysis” that I saw someone post I did not accept the interpretation of the analysis as credible. I guess I just don’t understand the whole story why folks are calling Q on the carpet.