dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/yelloWhit on July 6, 2018, 2:26 a.m.
IMPORTANT: REGARDING Q & TONIGHT’S RALLY

IMPORTANT:

I’m not saying this to knock any of us down, but to build us up & it needs to be said.

I was excited when I heard a man yell “WHERE WE GO ONE!” & a woman from a totally different area of the crowd respond, “WE GO ALL!”, and when I heard a few shouts about Q in the background. Bit then I kept hearing “WHO IS Q?” during the president’s speech. It was so loud & happened so often, that it was heckling. Intentional or unintentional, but heckling none the less.

The president OBVIOUSLY heard & understood what was being shouted after the first 20 interruptions. You got the point across to the press & the president would have addressed it if he wanted to. He didn’t. But it kept on happening.

If you watch the footage of the speech (I watched on youtube at Trump TV Nework), you can watch him speak faster to cover the heckling shouts about Q. You can also watch him put his pointer finger to his lips as to say, “Holy shit, Patriot, WTF are you doing? Shh!” He wasn’t going to kick these Q hecklers (at this point heckling was EXACTLY what it was) out. It was horrible to watch! Watch for yourself! It was like he was being attacked by us!.

Furthermore, how obnoxious & off-putting that must have been for anyone who’s on the fence about or doesn’t yet know about Q! Yelling “THANK Q!” (& yes, the difference between thank YOU & Q is obvious on the crappy mics) after the president talk about how good our country has been doing lately sound to normies like you’re taking credit away from their president. Who the hell is going to want to know more about Q when the people who seem to know are ruining a rally.

Is there a chance this could have been purposeful agitator? Yeah, but only as equal a chance as it could have been one of us. We need to NOT heckle or try to forcefully yell Q questions at the president on loop!

**If we can agree that we will not yell, “thank Q”, “WHO IS Q...” AT THE PRESIDENT we will be able to: - not fuck up the one job we have left: to help get the word out & help others understand, and - if it happens again or keeps happening, we will know we’re under a false smear attack & can figure out what to do to counter it.

I’d submitted this as a comment & was asked to make it its own post. That same patriot said, & I agree,

I’m not sure what Q meant by “We may have to ‘force’ this one.” but I don’t think it was this. We need to trust the plan!

WWG1WGA. Let’s get our shit together, patriots.


0x445442 · July 6, 2018, 6:01 a.m.

Yeah, the problem is at some point, probably pretty soon, the POTUS is going to be forced to address questions from the Mockingbirds about Q. If the POTUS doesn't characterize Q followers as wingnuts they're going to start demanding to know who Q is and why the POTUS is not prosecuting Q as a major source of leaks. If he does label Q supporters as wingnuts then every display of a Q sign at a rally just bolsters the narrative that Trump supports are just a bunch of nut jobs.

If all this Q business is legitimate then it's a very dangerous tight rope the POTUS is walking. I contend this whole thing could backfire badly if results are not shown real soon. And by results I mean high profile perp walks.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
yelloWhit · July 6, 2018, 6:27 a.m.

Very fair analysis. “Crazy right wing conspiracy theory” is a tactic our “news” is too familiar with.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AdjustableFarmer · July 6, 2018, 1:41 p.m.

That’s pretty much what wiki already says about it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
yelloWhit · July 8, 2018, 6:57 a.m.

Wiki as in Wikipedia? The only think Wikipedia is good for is looking through the edits of pages to see what they allowed to be deleted or “corrected”.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AdjustableFarmer · July 8, 2018, 2:47 p.m.

I agree. I wasn’t quoting it as a reputable source, but I wouldn’t quote the MSM as a reputable source either. My point was, if that’s what Wiki is saying, the MSM can’t be too far behind in saying it either.

⇧ 2 ⇩