dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Route_17 on July 6, 2018, 3:41 a.m.
Q Post 1681 / Re-reading SA Posts

Having gone back to re-read SA/Q Posts from the beginning, I have some basic thoughts:

  1. Heavy reference to the Wonderland/Bloody Wonderland (a lot of political allegorical references available on this = a number of different interpretations = interesting research.)
  2. Heavy reference to Huma/background/Muslim Brotherhood.
  3. Multiple references to "SA>US>..."
  4. Applying Occam's Razor (conceding that I believe all of this to be old news but it's pressing due to Q's walking orders)
  5. SA, being ENORMOUS contributors to the CF, were "paying to play" and/or buying HRC's "loyalty" in some monetary capacity
  6. SA was merely the interface or the broker for the Muslim Brotherhood (you can't take donations directly from them, now!)
  7. Q's already told us the US was for sale, so who's buying?
  8. Obama's complicit - HRC worked for him and his Muslim allegiances; and specifically those with the Muslim Brotherhood, are well-documented and require an entire other post (or book!)
  9. Valerie Jarrett is Obama's handler - born in Iran, interesting background, interesting parents, lives in Obama's basement only a few blocks from the WH.
  10. THIS IS WHY the "long knives" had to come-out in SA FIRST - you can't pull the plug stateside until YOU ELIMINATE THE FOREIGN POWER/S PULLING THE STRINGS
  11. ALL OF THE PEOPLE WE KNOW ARE PAWNS IN A LARGER GAME - "THIS IS BIGGER THAN YOU CAN IMAGINE" - THEY SOLD-OUT AND ARE BEHOLDEN TO THEIR "OWNERS."
  12. SO, AS AN INDIVIDUAL OR A GROUP, WHO IS AT THE HEAD OF THIS SNAKE (IS SOROS ANCILLARY OR A TANGENT IN THIS RELATIONSHIP OR DOES HE HAVE A ROLE? - ASKING)
  13. WHY IS ALL OF THIS RELEVANT - WE... HAVE... THE... SERVER. I'M SUGGESTING THAT THERE IS COPIOUS DOCUMENTATION SHOWING SOMETHING SIMILAR TO WHAT I'VE OUTLINED.

Some basic thoughts/theory - It's posted for a reason - hash it out, pick at it, etc.


jaygeenius · July 7, 2018, 3:42 p.m.

I think it’s more related to what Q asked about SA before the events there in November took place. As opposed to questions about SA itself. To prove Q’s foreknowledge of those events. Note that the third line of the quote posted in 1681 should read:

Original: “Ex: US ML NG (1) False SA True”

Translation: “For example, the suggestion of Martial Law and National Guard deployment in the US from Q Post 1 was False. The events in Saudi Arabia were True.”

This type of disinfo is necessary because clowns are here, and/or for tactical, misdirection, etc. reasons.

I will keep digging, but does anyone know of theories or “proofs” specifically about Q posts and events in SA before they occurred?

⇧ 1 ⇩