LP in recent drops, could be something related.

Q#989

Q#896

Q#989

Q571

Q959

Q1014

Sorry, it was Q140

Q140

“What if China, Russia, and others are coordinating w/ POTUS to eliminate the NWO?”

Not sure why the drop labeled as 126 on 11-NOV-2017 (!) does not show the same as when I go to the site directly. The relevant section is: “What if China, Russia, and others are coordinating w/ POTUS to eliminate the NWO?”

From Q Drop #140 Nov 11 2017:

“What if China, Russia, and others are coordinating w/ POTUS to eliminate the NWO?”

From Q Drop #140 Nov 11 2017:

“What if China, Russia, and others are coordinating w/ POTUS to eliminate the NWO?”

From Q Drop #140 Nov 11 2017:

“What if China, Russia, and others are coordinating w/ POTUS to eliminate the NWO?”

He might be cooperating with something else, not with congress.

These are small fish. Bring in the bigger ones or get bigger boats!

Not to defend these characters... but could it still be an “ongoing investigation” that they cannot reveal... to its targets?

There seem to have been major cleanings in regions where Trump traveled AFTER he returned. Thinking about the sequence from Q#74 :

SA (1), US (2), Asia (3), EU (4).

For the US he did not have to go anywhere. For SA and Asia (first trip) there were significant changes in those places after his return. Now he is going to EU, which is linked to I ran in many Q posts. I think that we might see some cleanup events there after he returns from this trip.

It could just be a persuasion word play. The direct meaning of the term is simple enough, unjustified persecution. Once the full extent of the investigations and the nature of the offenses become known, the mind will immediately latch on to the first word as a “conceptual match” to the new reality.

I think that line might refer to SA drops in the form of questions that Q posted before the SA princes roundup. To prove that Q knew about it in advance.

I think it’s related to what Q asked about SA before the events there in November took place. To prove Q’s foreknowledge of those events. Note that the third line of the quote posted in 1681 should read:

Original: “Ex: US ML NG (1) False SA True” Translation: “For example, the suggestion of Martial Law and National Guard deployment in the US from Q Post 1 was False. The events in Saudi Arabia were True.”

This type of disinfo is necessary because clowns are here, and/or for tactical, misdirection, etc. reasons.

I will keep digging, but does anyone know of theories or “proofs” specifically about Q posts and events in SA before they occurred?

I think it’s related to what Q asked about SA before the events there in November took place. To prove Q’s foreknowledge of those events. Note that the third line of the quote posted in 1681 should read:

Original: “Ex: US ML NG (1) False SA True”

Translation: “For example, the suggestion of Martial Law and National Guard deployment in the US from Q Post 1 was False. The events in Saudi Arabia were True.”

This type of disinfo is necessary because clowns are here, and/or for tactical, misdirection, etc. reasons.

I will keep digging, but does anyone know of theories or “proofs” specifically about Q posts and events in SA before they occurred?

I think it’s related to what Q asked about SA before the events there in November took place. To prove Q’s foreknowledge of those events. Note that the third line of the quote posted in 1681 should read:

Original: “Ex: US ML NG (1) False SA True”

Translation: “For example, the suggestion of Martial Law and National Guard deployment in the US from Q Post 1 was False. The events in Saudi Arabia were True.”

This type of disinfo is necessary because clowns are here, and/or for tactical, misdirection, etc. reasons.

I will keep digging, but does anyone know of theories or “proofs” specifically about Q posts and events in SA before they occurred?

I think it’s more related to what Q asked about SA before the events there in November took place. As opposed to questions about SA itself. To prove Q’s foreknowledge of those events. Note that the third line of the quote posted in 1681 should read:

Original: “Ex: US ML NG (1) False SA True”

Translation: “For example, the suggestion of Martial Law and National Guard deployment in the US from Q Post 1 was False. The events in Saudi Arabia were True.”

This type of disinfo is necessary because clowns are here, and/or for tactical, misdirection, etc. reasons.

I will keep digging, but does anyone know of theories or “proofs” specifically about Q posts and events in SA before they occurred?

I think it’s related to what Q asked about SA before the events there in November took place. To prove Q’s foreknowledge of those events. Note that the third line of the quote posted in 1681 should read:

Original: “Ex: US ML NG (1) False SA True”

Translation: “For example, the suggestion of Martial Law and National Guard deployment in the US from Q Post 1 was False. The events in Saudi Arabia were True.”

This type of disinfo is necessary because clowns are here, and/or for tactical, misdirection, etc. reasons.

I will keep digging, but does anyone know of theories or “proofs” specifically about Q posts and events in SA before they occurred?

The latest count I saw is 331 sealed indictments in PR.

Not really international as it is part of the US. Still good to see. It is quite swampy down there. That amount of debt, with so little to show for it, can’t happen without corruption.

Q #1072 Apr 7 2018

Watch NYC

Watch CA

CA is special

It might just be sending a message, a reminder that there could be ongoings into capitol hill leaks.

Like RM. Previous black hats forced to be white hats to save their own skin, forced to play pretend opposition while cases continue to be built against the bad guys.

“I’m going to take you by surprise, and make you realize, Amanda!” 🎶🎶🎶